Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #1  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion?




Modified by Killer_B at 2:09 PM 7/10/2003
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:04 AM
  #2  
rOby's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (Killer_B)

thats ur prob, VAFC

theres no way to overcome it, get a hondata or other standalone if you want some good results , especially w/ a 70mm tb
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
TurboDANDEE's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (rOby)

ill buy the Victor X off your hands
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #4  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (rOby)




Modified by Killer_B at 2:09 PM 7/10/2003
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #5  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (TurboDANDEE)

lets stay on the Subject.


Modified by Killer_B at 2:53 PM 6/27/2003
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #6  
rOby's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: houston
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (Killer_B)

its becuase of the 70mm tb, slap on your stock and see the diff. the victor x is for high end power generally speaking
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #7  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (rOby)

i might take it off and put it back to stock becuz it's a nice weekend and alot of racing will be going on!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
ReVtecSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, USA
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (Killer_B)

what kind of turbo and how many lbs of boost are you running? are you taking it all the way to redline?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 08:24 PM
  #9  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (ReVtecSi)

t3/t4, don't know the trim. 10lbs.

my entire power band was affected. it's so bad that i checked the i/c piping for leaks. everything is fine though.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 08:46 PM
  #10  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (Killer_B)

Well, lets see. You've got a big intake cam (not good for lag), not much displacement (not good for lag), a big intake manifold (not good for lag), a big t/b (again...), and a stock motor. It's all about having a good combination. You've got some parts that are designed for very high rpm and high hp, yet you're not doing either. Your car would be way quicker with a stock intake manifold and gsr cams, trust me...
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 09:07 PM
  #11  
quikB18B's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Sewers, Usa
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, lets see. You've got a big intake cam (not good for lag), not much displacement (not good for lag), a big intake manifold (not good for lag), a big t/b (again...), and a stock motor. It's all about having a good combination. You've got some parts that are designed for very high rpm and high hp, yet you're not doing either. Your car would be way quicker with a stock intake manifold and gsr cams, trust me...</TD></TR></TABLE>

good answer Tony,

btw if u wanted an aftermarket IM skunk would have been better for your street/steup. Stock is ok id research and see where u can better spend your $ like toward a standalone.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #12  
11psiTurboSI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,004
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (Killer_B)

"the car is not tuned well but it ran very well with the stock B16 intake manifold"
tune the car first
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 07:21 AM
  #13  
TTWS6's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Hickville, usa
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (9psiTurboSI)

what is everyones verdict on this?? because my setup will be similar. ecept my b16 has pistons and rods and will be tuned for 8psi low boost and 15 high boost ( hondata) and I have a GSR drag 3 kit with a To4e and will Have GSR cams. I was very serious about getting a Victor x with matching tb but now I am not so sure is the victor x worth ot for 320whp?


Modified by TTWS6 at 5:57 PM 6/28/2003
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 07:36 AM
  #14  
rainmanEK's Avatar
big strong guy
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 0
From: LUTZ, fl, usa
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (TTWS6)

Bigger is not Always Better!!


Eric
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 09:02 AM
  #15  
TTWS6's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Hickville, usa
Default

ttt
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #16  
jinxproof99's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 0
From: VIRGINIA
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (TTWS6)

running low boost, under 400 hp, and revving less than 9000-9500, stick with a skunk2 manifold, you'll net much better results. reread tony's post......"learn it, live it, know it........"
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 01:18 AM
  #17  
Killer_B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise, FL
Default




Modified by Killer_B at 2:10 PM 7/10/2003
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 06:44 AM
  #18  
DBallz's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers, NY
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, lets see. You've got a big intake cam (not good for lag), not much displacement (not good for lag), a big intake manifold (not good for lag), a big t/b (again...), and a stock motor. It's all about having a good combination. You've got some parts that are designed for very high rpm and high hp, yet you're not doing either. Your car would be way quicker with a stock intake manifold and gsr cams, trust me...</TD></TR></TABLE>

Tony I have seen the car run it is very quick for a stock motor. I have a set of GSR cams and I do agree with you the car feels like it pulls much harder but I want to try the CTR intake cam. I have heard very good things about that. But I agree with him getting ride of such a large TB.

Killer building a GSR huh nice. Hope I will be able to keep up with you. Oh and BTW the hondata tuning at 15psi well I know I will get better #’s than that person. The motor that guy is running has problems. I mean he is throwing a check engine light on Hondata that is usually a problem. Cause those things don’t usually throw codes. Anyway good luck and see you on the block.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 10:24 PM
  #19  
Spoonin's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Denton, Maryland, U.S.
Default Re: Victor X on Turbo B16..mine sux! whats ur opinion? (rainmanEK)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rainmanEK &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Bigger is not Always Better!!


Eric </TD></TR></TABLE>

EXACTLY!!! If some of the parts of the engine are too big or too open (the big TB, IM, the CTR cam, the GSR cam) then, you will lose air velocity.

Imagine blowing air through a normal size straw (with your mouth). Now imagine blowing air through a 2" pipe. It would be a lot tougher, wouldn't it? Same principle with your turbo blowing air through all that big plumbing.

Part of the reason that the cams might be holding you back is because one trick to a fast all motor high revving car is overlap (exhaust and intake valve open at the same time so, when the exhaust leaves the combustion chamber it will create a "vaccuum" to suck in more air and fuel through the simultaneously open intake valve [if tuned] and to create a better combustion with no exhaust left in the combustion chamber). YOU DON'T WANT OVERLAP WITH A TURBO MOTOR (not yelling, just trying to make this rule of thumb stick in your mind). Your best bet will be to get those gears adjusted to attempt to try and dial out the overlap but, that CTR cam is pretty aggressive and might have way too much duration (lets too much air into the combustion chamber which is why your VAFC is't doing much cuz, a piggyback fuel controller only adjusts fuel by +-%50 and an EMS, such as Hondata, can adjust fuel by as much as needed). Look at turbo cams. They have very little duration.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B18Flip
Classifieds: Forced Induction
6
Oct 23, 2003 06:11 PM
TurboTegB18c
Classifieds: Forced Induction
15
May 6, 2003 08:47 PM
metal-x
Forced Induction
9
Jan 12, 2003 11:40 AM
youngkow
Forced Induction
2
Jan 4, 2003 02:02 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:25 AM.