Im trying to figure out why they're different and if there are any advantages or disadvantages to using the one in the second pic.

 

The one in the 2nd pic looks alot smaller too.

 

Depending on the size of the cooler and which chassis you are using....I'd be cafeful if that inlet elbow on the end tank will fit.
It is routed in a nice position to use a shorter charge pipe from the turbo to the cooler, but it looks to come up pretty far.
I'd measure those inlet/endtank dimensions first and compare them to the room on the chassis.

 

Heh alot of ppl are lookin at the pics with no response.. I've seen the first pic's type 31 in alot of posts that I searched through.. havnt seen any of the 2nd pic.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SLPR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Depending on the size of the cooler and which chassis you are using....I'd be cafeful if that inlet elbow on the end tank will fit.
It is routed in a nice position to use a shorter charge pipe from the turbo to the cooler, but it looks to come up pretty far.
I'd measure those inlet/endtank dimensions first and compare them to the room on the chassis.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Obviously greddy did it for a reason. Anyone know what car this intercooler is made for?

 

The second intercooler pictured is actually a type 26 intercooler... think it was for SOHCs, but not sure

 

ahh crap, dude was tryin to sell it to me as a type 31 for $300

 

I've seen the 2nd one for the '92-95 Civic sohc greddy kit.

 

okay the type 31 is rated to about 350hp the type 24 is rated to about 500hp