Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Jun II theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #1  
Edwin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Default Jun II theory

So has anyone else beside Importbuilders and Mike K tried the JUN II intake cam with the stock exhaust cam combination? Did you get similar power gains?
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
canuck-mx6's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Pegging the bling meter
Default Re: Jun II theory (Edwin)

.....be a man, get the new JUN 4s
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #3  
Cal's Avatar
Cal
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Cerebral, Cortex
Default Re: Jun II theory (canuck-mx6)

^ and spend $5K on the head and block to run them to their potential.

I like the combo, requires good tuning. I'd mix a Skunk2 Stage 1 and an ITR ex cam if I were you, give it a whirl. No one has tried that yet, or at least from what I have seen

Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 04:49 AM
  #4  
canuck-mx6's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Pegging the bling meter
Default Re: Jun II theory (Cal)

Nah, Sinsii, made 205 whp with stock ITR compression, Jun 3s and the JUN ECU.
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 06:54 AM
  #5  
Gong Show's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
From: I NEED 2 LITERS, IL
Default Re: Jun II theory (Cal)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cal &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">^ and spend $5K on the head and block to run them to their potential.

I like the combo, requires good tuning. I'd mix a Skunk2 Stage 1 and an ITR ex cam if I were you, give it a whirl. No one has tried that yet, or at least from what I have seen

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Merritt has tried this, and I think she is still running it like this til this day. But she told me she hasnt got it tuned yet. And I believe katman also tried this, but also never tuned it.

So it has been tried and it will work. But still no results of any proven power.

Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 07:40 AM
  #6  
ajchen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, USA
Default Re: Jun II theory (Gong Show)

why do people drop cams in but do not tune? i'd be very anxious to know if i was making maximum power/torque...

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Gong Show &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Merritt has tried this, and I think she is still running it like this til this day. But she told me she hasnt got it tuned yet. And I believe katman also tried this, but also never tuned it.

So it has been tried and it will work. But still no results of any proven power.

</TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 08:03 AM
  #7  
Gong Show's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
From: I NEED 2 LITERS, IL
Default Re: Jun II theory (ajchen)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ajchen &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why do people drop cams in but do not tune? i'd be very anxious to know if i was making maximum power/torque...

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Beats the hell out of me. I know Jason aint all about the big bang power. Cant speak for Merritt. But I like most just want a fun car to drive. So if that means sticking with my CTR cams, then thats fine with me. I just wanna do some events.


But going with a set-up like that, I would think its only right to tune it. I know Jason tuned his old motor which had the Spoon intake and ITR exhaust cam.
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 08:07 AM
  #8  
Shark Tank's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: coming to a SW FL city near you
Default Re: Jun II theory (Gong Show)

spoon intake cam and itr exhaust cam = worthless

i had the jun 2 itr combo....car had no ballz until after 5k rpm then it took off...made 216/151 on my 2.0L with the jun/itr combo after tuning
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 08:11 AM
  #9  
Gong Show's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
From: I NEED 2 LITERS, IL
Default Re: Jun II theory (Shark Tank)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Shark Tank &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">spoon intake cam and itr exhaust cam = worthless</TD></TR></TABLE>

I could careless, Im not buying that set-up

Hell, alot of Spoon crap is worthless in my eyes. But to some, its the god sent JDM parts from honda heaven.
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #10  
Edwin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Default Re: Jun II theory (Shark Tank)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Shark Tank &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">spoon intake cam and itr exhaust cam = worthless

i had the jun 2 itr combo....car had no ballz until after 5k rpm then it took off...made 216/151 on my 2.0L with the jun/itr combo after tuning</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nice to hear input on the two, thanks for the comment on the combination.
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 09:01 PM
  #11  
euclid's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,954
Likes: 0
From: C.O.M.A.
Default Re: Jun II theory (Edwin)

what would be the benefit of only running the jun intake cam and not the exhaust cam too, just from a cost standpoint?
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
hungsteR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 1
From: DFW, TX
Default Re: Jun II theory (euclid)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by euclid &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what would be the benefit of only running the jun intake cam and not the exhaust cam too, just from a cost standpoint?</TD></TR></TABLE>

From a cost standpoint? You'd only have to buy one cam. Am I missing something here?
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #13  
euclid's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,954
Likes: 0
From: C.O.M.A.
Default Re: Jun II theory (hungsteR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hungsteR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

From a cost standpoint? You'd only have to buy one cam. Am I missing something here?</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah ,i'm making sure i'm not missing anything here, it seems that you would be seriously sacrificing the performance of the intake cam by not running a jun exhasut cam too, so i'm wondering if LOWER COST is the only reason that people would want to run this setup? or are there other benefits?
Reply
Old May 2, 2003 | 10:59 PM
  #14  
FJO3's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: Jun II theory (Edwin)

No one has a dyno of this setup?
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 02:47 AM
  #15  
Shark Tank's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: coming to a SW FL city near you
Default Re: Jun II theory (2000R#1355)

yes, the cost thing is the only issue. i have a dyno graph of it but i have to scan it...put it this way, this vs. my spec b setup is a joke...spec b's had 15-20whp and 15-20lbft from idle to about 5k rpm vs the jun 2/itr combo...the combo is worthless unless you stay over 5k rpm which was what my vtec was set at...so if you only do track races or drag its cool. for a street car it sucked
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 09:04 AM
  #16  
Gong Show's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
From: I NEED 2 LITERS, IL
Default Re: Jun II theory (Shark Tank)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Shark Tank &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, the cost thing is the only issue. i have a dyno graph of it but i have to scan it...put it this way, this vs. my spec b setup is a joke...spec b's had 15-20whp and 15-20lbft from idle to about 5k rpm vs the jun 2/itr combo...the combo is worthless unless you stay over 5k rpm which was what my vtec was set at...so if you only do track races or drag its cool. for a street car it sucked
</TD></TR></TABLE>

But IMHO, you cant really compare the two set-ups against each other. Toda B's will blow Jun2's out of the water. I'd think Jun3's and Toda B's ould be more of a comparson. And If Im not mistaken, the JUN2 in/ITR ex set-up was mostly a midrange set-up. So people looking for a little more mid, and a tad bit more top-end would go with this set-up. Plus save a few dollars.

Search the archive for Mike K, he did the test. I might have it saved in my email, I'll check.
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 02:59 PM
  #17  
Shark Tank's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: coming to a SW FL city near you
Default Re: Jun II theory (Gong Show)

i could care less. i am running jun 3 cams in my car now...all i am saying is the setup made no power below 5k rpm...my itr cams destroyed that setup from 3-5k rpm as well...the car was just plain flat and it was tuned properly with hondata. if you want to do the jun 2s do the whole set. thats the best advice i can give you
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #18  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: Jun II theory (Gong Show)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Gong Show &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

But IMHO, you cant really compare the two set-ups against each other. Toda B's will blow Jun2's out of the water. I'd think Jun3's and Toda B's ould be more of a comparson. And If Im not mistaken, the JUN2 in/ITR ex set-up was mostly a midrange set-up. So people looking for a little more mid, and a tad bit more top-end would go with this set-up. Plus save a few dollars.

Search the archive for Mike K, he did the test. I might have it saved in my email, I'll check.</TD></TR></TABLE>


spec c's vs jun 3's would be more comparable.....
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #19  
Shark Tank's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: coming to a SW FL city near you
Default Re: Jun II theory (Black R)

if you look at the import builders comparison, jun wins peak power and toda wins midrange and more likely the street useable power categories
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 09:55 PM
  #20  
Cal's Avatar
Cal
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Cerebral, Cortex
Default Re: Jun II theory (canuck-mx6)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by canuck-mx6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nah, Sinsii, made 205 whp with stock ITR compression, Jun 3s and the JUN ECU. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Nah, Jun 3 and Jun 4 arn't the same
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SuperImport
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Mar 19, 2005 08:45 PM
Grip
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
May 19, 2004 11:10 PM
TypeR714
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
Jun 29, 2003 02:58 PM
acuraqc
Acura Integra Type-R
1
Feb 19, 2003 09:48 AM
TypeR0149
Acura Integra Type-R
3
Mar 24, 2002 05:36 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:01 PM.