Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

S-AFC or V-AFC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2001 | 01:12 PM
  #1  
00 Si's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Deltona, Fl, USA
Default S-AFC or V-AFC

I know that the V-AFC controls the VTEC engaugement point but I have seen some people with GSR's and Si's that have the S-AFC. Why, is there a reason for this or not, just preference?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2001 | 01:58 PM
  #2  
bhcvc's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default Re: S-AFC or V-AFC (00 turbosi)

S-AFC's are a lil lower in price...not a big diff, about $20-$30. Depending on the turbo setup, it may or may not be that important on where VTEC engages. On an NA setup, however, different cams like different engagement points and power can suffer dramatically if VTEC doesn't engage at the right time. This effect is less pronounced on most FI setups. Also, maybe they got them used from a friend for cheap. For a honda, I'd always want VTEC control if I had the option, whether FI or NA. Fields SFC-VTEC is a lower cost alternative to look into, tho I've heard of some problems with it running on certain setups. never had experience with the Fields units, so I can't say much aside from what I've read/heard. HTH.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2001 | 05:35 AM
  #3  
DragII's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,940
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: S-AFC or V-AFC (bhcvc)

I have experience w/ both VAFC is better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PreludePhill
Honda Prelude
1
Apr 4, 2004 10:50 AM
Chubs
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
6
Apr 23, 2003 06:32 PM
_Endless_
Forced Induction
4
Jan 4, 2003 08:39 AM
PressurizedSi
Forced Induction
7
Dec 9, 2002 07:30 PM
SuperRice
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
Apr 29, 2002 04:37 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.