ok i need a nice slam that rides right
who recommends what, seriously now i have h&r's and the height in the front is way more than the back, the back is perfect but the front is like 2 fingers between the wheel well and the tire. i'm pissed.
honestly i think the eibach prokit looks like stock height...i'd go with eibach sportlines. i like them. trust me i know what your going through..i had h&r's they made my car look like i alway had luggage in the back that weighed the car down.
Airbags are for you, yo.
It's funny you said that.
I was reading this thread and thinking that it was a little different in the RSX/EP Forum than it is in other HT forums.
The only down side is that the "feel and performance" people and the "looks and ride" people could end up confusing each other at some point, leading to both groups owning products that they're not satisfied with.
It's funny you said that.
I was reading this thread and thinking that it was a little different in the RSX/EP Forum than it is in other HT forums.
The only down side is that the "feel and performance" people and the "looks and ride" people could end up confusing each other at some point, leading to both groups owning products that they're not satisfied with.
This is why a mod needs to be appointed to get this forum going in the correct direction, but I won't harp on that subject again.
Trending Topics
Yes, but this is "Honda-tech". So, it's assumed that lowering questions would be performance related and not looks related. If someone is going for looks, then the appearance forum or ephatch.com is a good place to go.
This is why a mod needs to be appointed to get this forum going in the correct direction, but I won't harp on that subject again.
This is why a mod needs to be appointed to get this forum going in the correct direction, but I won't harp on that subject again.
Of course, if this forum is to follow that criteria, the discussions of anything other than stock would need to be discussed in the proper context. If one wanted to discuss the availability of a CTR knock-off rear spoiler, one would need to qualify their post first as a "interested in negating negative lift in the rear" so as not to get chided or otherwise flamed for being interested in appearance only.
I agree that misinformation, or at least conflicting information can result from performance-minded people being in the same discussion as appearance-minded people, but I feel it remains the responsibility of the viewer/reader to filter out the "wheat from the chaff" in these discussions. In any case, restricting posts here to performance-only discussion certainly won't aid in educating the appearance-oriented only person to the benefits of performance-oriented modifications and bolt-ons.
Oh yeah! This was about springs wasn't it? Make mine Pro-Kit!
Point taken. My main gripe was with the original wording (or lack thereof) of the original post.
I realize appearance questions will come up every now and then, which is fine, but people posting questions in broken english about slamming their rides really needs to be thwarted.
Heck, I'll probably post something about my JDM rear wing when I get it in, but I guess I was somewhat going to the extreme trying to prove a point with this forum.
I realize appearance questions will come up every now and then, which is fine, but people posting questions in broken english about slamming their rides really needs to be thwarted.
Heck, I'll probably post something about my JDM rear wing when I get it in, but I guess I was somewhat going to the extreme trying to prove a point with this forum.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sean O'Gorman
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
34
Sep 30, 2004 06:18 AM



