hey, sorry if this is in the wrong forum, but i was wondering what everyones oppinion was on which was better, the khumo ecsta supra712's, or the nitto 450 extremes? thanks.

 

our of those two? the kuhmo's

my peronal choice, Falken Ziex 512

 

well actually..i guess u guys could just give me suggestions for tires, those were the two i was leaning towards cause of price and from what i hear they are decent tires. but why the falken ziex's? thanks for the reply by the way.

 

because thats the tires that i have

i love em!

 

I recommend the Azenis best bang for the buck IMO

 

I would say the Kumho's for daily use
its what I use



(sorry about the pis twice just got my digi cam and never haave posted pics )
Forgot to mention I use Falkens on the track (great tire but wears too quick for me)


[Modified by ITRacer121, 4:32 PM 2/22/2003]

 

i heard that to kumos suck for tracksion

 

If you're on a budget, I have ventus tires by hankook, and they aren't the greatest tires but they wear a hell of a lot better than kuhmos and they are only $77. Worth a look if $$$ is an issue.

 

brigestone s-3

 

i had the falken ziex they are really nice, daily and auto x use. the azenis were better on the auto x and i think the same in the weather, but i never took it in snow. rain was the only thing i had a chance to test it in, but i don't drive like a dumbass in bad weather if i had good or bad tires. any tire is good if you drive safely. good luck

 

kumho tires are nice for daily driving . . .
i used to own a set of them myself . . . i liked them

 

ive had the azenis and kumho s ...the kumho s were great in the rain and smooth services..but on the freeway construction zones they seem d to have a mind of their own..the azenis s are a better all round tire but a little bit more noisey..ive got the azenis ST115 d now

 

You heard Kumho's suck for traction ??? STFU noob you have no idea what the hell you are talking about.

 

What is the difference between those and regular Azenis???
how much/where?

 

the ST115 s have a different more aggressive tread design for all weather use and made of a harder rubber compound for longer wear..the tread design is more like the nitto 555 s

 

hey guy, thanks alot for all the replies. no one has really said anything about the nittos? as for bang for the buck, i was checking tires.com, and the khumos are like..74 bucks or something. i dunno if that place has a bad reputation or something, and thats why you guys dont shop there, but if any of you have the time check it out, cause the prices are good. thanks again. more comments are welcome.

 

i got my ST 115 a from americas tires..same at tires.com..and a good price too $120 for 235/45/17 s ...just about the same price as the kumho s

 

i got my tires from a local Discount Tire shop ( http://www.tires.com )

 

can't beat my FALKEN allseason's 15" 205/50/15 $57installed each. great tires w/ great tractions. best all-seasons tires i had used.

 

kumho
falken


[Modified by fastwanabe, 12:03 AM 2/23/2003]

 

anyone have the Yokohama ES100's?

 

kuhmo
Falken

but hey they are cheap

 

falken azenis

 

i have kuhmo 712, there good i have no problem with them . but my next tires are falken.

 

the khumos are dope, zeix are also nice, the brigestone g-rid is also nice and the dunlop sp8000 own.