N/A or Turbo ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 18, 2003 | 09:00 AM

allaboutgsr

Thread Starter

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 64

Likes: 0

From: los angeles, ca, 90042

N/A or Turbo ?

quick question to everyone...would you go with a naturally aspirated car and build it to its full potential or would you build your car to a certain point and turbo it ?

Feb 18, 2003 | 01:17 PM

joe_bocc

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 1,074

Likes: 0

From: Brampton, ON, CA

Re: N/A or Turbo ? (allaboutgsr)

me personnaly, I'm going all motor, but everyones different.

Feb 18, 2003 | 01:20 PM

ITR-Spoon

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 304

Likes: 0

From: socaL, USA

Re: N/A or Turbo ? (allaboutgsr)

im going all motor in my ITR for a little while, then Turbo when i get money

[Modified by Sleepel2_Motol2s, 2:21 PM 2/18/2003]

Feb 18, 2003 | 05:48 PM

Kaizen

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 72

Likes: 0

From: Northern, VA, USA

Re: N/A or Turbo ? (Sleepel2_Motol2s)

N/A is much more reliable and can be done gradually w/ new additions. Turbo you gotta buy so much crap at one time and it requires 2 things: money & patience. If you're willing to accept the occasional headaches and inconvenience...go turbo. Boost is addictive...

Feb 18, 2003 | 05:51 PM

DJ KrunchyKracker

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 911

Likes: 0

From: West Side, til I die, or i get really rich

Re: N/A or Turbo ? (Kaizen)

i am going all motor for now. mostly because i know when i get together my boosted H22 everything else in the world will seem irrelevant.

Feb 18, 2003 | 06:13 PM

tilt

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 2,554

Likes: 1

From: Plano, TX, usa

Re: N/A or Turbo ? (allaboutgsr)

NA, crazy valvetrains are cool

Quote:

quick question to everyone...would you go with a naturally aspirated car and build it to its full potential or would you build your car to a certain point and turbo it ?