Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
CBR600OnTop's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Default Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels

For that past hour I have been having a debate about which one would benifet me better. I said chomoly would b/c it is stronger and better heat resistant. He then said that the aluminim flywheel is stronger and better heat resistant. I want your guys's opinion. Which one do you think is stronger and more compatible with heat?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 02:35 PM
  #2  
STHPERFORMANCE's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,726
Likes: 0
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TegTuner)

my vote goes to the ACT flywheels... i own a 8lbs ACT myself... Chromoly
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 02:44 PM
  #3  
MrFatBooty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI, USA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TegTuner)

Both are good.

There are some horror stories about aluminum flywheels coming apart into a million pieces and flying into the cabin. Very infrequent indeed.

What it comes down to in my book, is how you go about servicing them. Aluminum is not suitable as a friction surface, so most aluminum flywheels have a replaceable friction surface which is what the clutch disk gets pushed on to. When you replace the clutch, you replace the friction surface. Chromoly flywheels are just like any other steel flywheel, when you replace the clutch you have it resurfaced.

Some people like it one way, some people like it the other. Neither one really seems to be an "advantage" to me though.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
mugensport9's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From: scottsdale, arizona, u.s.a
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (MrFatBooty)

Both are good.

There are some horror stories about aluminum flywheels coming apart into a million pieces and flying into the cabin. Very infrequent indeed.

What it comes down to in my book, is how you go about servicing them. Aluminum is not suitable as a friction surface, so most aluminum flywheels have a replaceable friction surface which is what the clutch disk gets pushed on to. When you replace the clutch, you replace the friction surface. Chromoly flywheels are just like any other steel flywheel, when you replace the clutch you have it resurfaced.

Some people like it one way, some people like it the other. Neither one really seems to be an "advantage" to me though.

Sorry but that is chromoly that comes apart. My vote is for the aluminum 7.4lb fidanza flywheel, the aluminum will not break apart and therefor will not KILL you!

Chromoly < aluminum


[Modified by mugensport9, 2:43 AM 2/16/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 05:56 PM
  #5  
MrFatBooty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI, USA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (mugensport9)

Okay well then that makes it both that are rumored to come apart. Because there are plenty of places where people have claimed that aluminum will come apart and now you're saying that chromoly is going to.

Personally all of the people's cars that I've seen with either type of lightened flywheel, they've never had it disintegrate. So all the rumors about that sort of thing are grossly overexaggerated to me.


[Modified by MrFatBooty, 8:58 PM 2/15/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
ahead's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (MrFatBooty)

ive never herd of the chromoly fw's breaking apart, only the aluminum. either way its really rare anyway. im goin with a fidanza.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #7  
hondaswaper's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA, usa
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (ahead)

didnt Lisa Kubo blow up a Jun flywheel like 3 yrs ago?? the said the only thing that was salvaged was the manifolds and the valve cover
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 01:03 PM
  #8  
joe_bocc's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, ON, CA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (hondaswaper)

didnt Lisa Kubo blow up a Jun flywheel like 3 yrs ago?? the said the only thing that was salvaged was the manifolds and the valve cover
hahaha...Thats amazing. It must have been pretty violent.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 02:15 PM
  #9  
DJ KrunchyKracker's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: West Side, til I die, or i get really rich
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (joe_bocc)

i dont know i think that even though it is a little heavier i would probably trust the chromoly one. aluminum doesnt dissapate heat that well and arent that great under high heat applications. chromoly is super hard, super strong, and doesnt weigh that much more. whats the difference 7lbs to 9lbs. 2 pounds and peice of mind are worth it to me.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 06:40 AM
  #10  
hondaswaper's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA, usa
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (DJ KrunchyKracker)

chrome moly is brittle and shatters , thats why Nascar uses Mild steele for their Chassis.......
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #11  
TimoneX's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
From: Wayland, MI, US
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (hondaswaper)

Aluminum does not shatter, it warps. Chromoly shatters...it's far more brittle than alum. I'd trust either from a good manufacturer, but forced to choose I say aluminum.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 09:34 AM
  #12  
integra6650's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: holmdel, nj, usa
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TimoneX)

from all i have read the only dif is alum is better at low end it allows easier movement, but once spinning and it has the inertia chromoly (aka the heavy flywheel) starts spinnning and your better off and who cares which shatters we're driving imports with a passenger side tranny(jk)
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #13  
ActiveAero's Avatar
Paragraph Alert
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,527
Likes: 2
From: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TegTuner)

Doesn't matter. Get the lightest and cheapest. My vote goes to Fidanza. $300 and 7.5lbs.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 03:23 PM
  #14  
LonelyDriver02's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX, USA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TimoneX)

Aluminum does not shatter, it warps. Chromoly shatters...it's far more brittle than alum. I'd trust either from a good manufacturer, but forced to choose I say aluminum.
I agree.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #15  
hybrider's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,838
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (ActiveAero)

Get the lightest and cheapest. My vote goes to Fidanza. $300 and 7.5lbs.
and in the end, thats all that matters

got my ClutchMasters 7.5lb flywheel for $299 (thx chad)

and i COULDNT be happier


[Modified by hybrider93, 7:36 PM 2/23/2003]
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 07:25 PM
  #16  
integra6650's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
From: holmdel, nj, usa
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (hybrider93)

i actually left the stock one in there didn't have the moola at the time just finished my turbo and clutch went shortly after so i had no cash had to borrow money for the clutch i have had no probs with it
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 07:42 PM
  #17  
beau_safken's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, CO, USA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (integra6650)

The best thing you could do if you're concerned about the strength of your flywheel is to get your stock one machined. You can get it lightened very easily by an experienced machinist. You can easily get the stock one center weighted and cut down from 18 pounds to 10-12 pounds and it will be a lot stronger than an aluminum or chromoly flywheel.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 08:58 PM
  #18  
ScottEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
From: Hiboosta, IL, USA
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (beau_safken)

I have a quick question about the flywheel subject, on a 220hp max turbo setup would it be better to go with a 8.8lb (too light?) or be better to go with a 10.8lb, or maybe just a stock?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #19  
ArinX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
From: 818, SoCal
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (TegTuner)

Well On the K series R motors honda is using Chromoly so i guess honda knows best
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 04:44 AM
  #20  
TimoneX's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
From: Wayland, MI, US
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (ArinX)

If Honda had done everything the way I would've wanted it I wouldn't be modding my car now. You'll find a great many people swapping out their flys for lighter chromoly and aluminum on ITRs. Myself, I got a great deal on a Fidanza alum($290) flywheel and jumped on it.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 05:00 AM
  #21  
TimoneX's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
From: Wayland, MI, US
Default Re: Aluminum vs. Chromoly Flywheels (beta13)

I have a quick question about the flywheel subject, on a 220hp max turbo setup would it be better to go with a 8.8lb (too light?) or be better to go with a 10.8lb, or maybe just a stock?
I'd go with the lighter option.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
f150harleytruck7
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
35
Dec 16, 2005 09:26 PM
honcrx91si
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
May 17, 2004 05:01 PM
Mark
Acura Integra
7
Jun 5, 2003 08:10 PM
JohnR265
Acura Integra Type-R
8
Oct 12, 2001 04:16 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM.