who make best ic core?
i did a side by side comparison between a spearco intercooler and a pwr intercooler. i definately noticed that the pwr core is nicer IMO.
PWR on top, Spearco on bottom:
PWR, now thats craftsmanship:
PWR on top, Spearco on bottom:
PWR, now thats craftsmanship:
I used to run a spearco, when i upgraded all my components for my new engine set-up i went with the pwr. The quality is ALOT nicer than the spearco. I have recommend two other friends to purchase the pwr's, and they are very satisfied with them. It would be a close tie between the pwr and greddy.
i did a side by side comparison between a spearco intercooler and a pwr intercooler. i definately noticed that the pwr core is nicer IMO
but that dont tell me the one that has better efficiency
more input plz
guru plz comment on this
thx
Trending Topics
eh, I can't vote because I'm still in trial user phase, but my thumbs up goes to PWR, however I've always liked GReddy's ICs. the quality of both impress me more than Spearco.
OK , According to April 20003 vol 19 no 4, Back to basics TurboMag/Turbonetics it cleary state that the bar and plate is a better unit.
If you turn topage48 on intercooler tech. On a tube and fin intercooler sapce is lost from where the joints for sealing are used. So a 3.5 inch core will have tubes only 2.87inch wide..Quote" Unable to maneuver around the machinery,Also, fin design in the charge side, unside the extruded tubes, was limited by the extrusion machine,which impeded the design of the charged side fins geometry to meet individual custom applications.It also states Tube and fin has a larger leakage rate compared to the bar and plate.Furthermore, tube and fin are more susceptible to road damage.also at extreme pressure the tube can ballon up."also , a tube and fin design has a lot of room between rows where the bar and palte unit can get more rows into a givenarea with more area passagewhich means more unitcfm and a more efficient unit. The down fall of the bar and plate is the weight of the cores/unit and the price. It state the tube and find are chaper in MFG costs. I really wanted to get a PWR due to the hype and the PRICE of the tube and fin. like everyone else i only want the best. Which is better...?????
OK , According to April 20003 vol 19 no 4, Back to basics TurboMag/Turbonetics it cleary state that the bar and plate is a better unit.
If you turn topage48 on intercooler tech. On a tube and fin intercooler sapce is lost from where the joints for sealing are used. So a 3.5 inch core will have tubes only 2.87inch wide..Quote" Unable to maneuver around the machinery,Also, fin design in the charge side, unside the extruded tubes, was limited by the extrusion machine,which impeded the design of the charged side fins geometry to meet individual custom applications.It also states Tube and fin has a larger leakage rate compared to the bar and plate.Furthermore, tube and fin are more susceptible to road damage.also at extreme pressure the tube can ballon up."also , a tube and fin design has a lot of room between rows where the bar and palte unit can get more rows into a givenarea with more area passagewhich means more unitcfm and a more efficient unit. The down fall of the bar and plate is the weight of the cores/unit and the price. It state the tube and find are chaper in MFG costs. I really wanted to get a PWR due to the hype and the PRICE of the tube and fin. like everyone else i only want the best. Which is better...?????
If you turn topage48 on intercooler tech. On a tube and fin intercooler sapce is lost from where the joints for sealing are used. So a 3.5 inch core will have tubes only 2.87inch wide..Quote" Unable to maneuver around the machinery,Also, fin design in the charge side, unside the extruded tubes, was limited by the extrusion machine,which impeded the design of the charged side fins geometry to meet individual custom applications.It also states Tube and fin has a larger leakage rate compared to the bar and plate.Furthermore, tube and fin are more susceptible to road damage.also at extreme pressure the tube can ballon up."also , a tube and fin design has a lot of room between rows where the bar and palte unit can get more rows into a givenarea with more area passagewhich means more unitcfm and a more efficient unit. The down fall of the bar and plate is the weight of the cores/unit and the price. It state the tube and find are chaper in MFG costs. I really wanted to get a PWR due to the hype and the PRICE of the tube and fin. like everyone else i only want the best. Which is better...?????
so spearco that use bar and plate would be better choice?
Spearco uses both tube and fin and bar and plate. I have Spearco tube and fin and bar and plate intercoolers.where you interested in puchasing one or just wanting to get an idea and/or more info.
[Modified by camp1320.com, 4:28 PM 2/15/2003]
[Modified by camp1320.com, 4:28 PM 2/15/2003]
One of my friends got a swap from this company a while back and now they sell intercoolers. Has anyone ordered one from them?
http://www.streetimports.com/boost
http://www.streetimports.com/boost
yes PWR only makes tube and fin. Laskey Racing has the Best prices on PWR stuff.. i dont think anyone will touch them on pricing on PWR intercoolers. If your choice is PWR im Earl if you want Spearco im me.
Greddy makes some good intercoolers imo. its like they were make for the car; all bolts connect to stock holes and they fit perfectly or at tleast the type 31 does.


