Hello,
I know cosmeticly the Skunk and the ITR are similar..But what about there specs? Bore? Runner lenth?? Plennum size??? Are they the same or different..?
-10k

 

I believe they are the same, you are just not paying the same as you would for an "ITR" manifold.

 

I didn't do any measurements, but having both a Skunk and a ITR manifold in my hands at the same time (about 3 weeks ago) the Skunk looks like an exact copy.

Mattj

 

They are probably similar enough that there would be virtually no performance advantage/disadvantage from running one or the other.

 

ic..k THANKS GUYS

 

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=402208

I was wondering the same thing and found this in the Tech forum.......

 

I know cosmeticly the Skunk and the ITR are similar..But what about there specs? Bore? Runner lenth?? Plennum size??? Are they the same or different..?

I believe the runners on the skunk two are a wee bit shorter, and the plennem is is bigger as well. The skunk two made 11 whp on my b16!!!

 

I seen my friends and I could never tell the difference by looking at them. Looks identical and the "Intake" is the same.

 

For future reference:

A search for "Skunk2 Manifold" in the ITR forum's archived threads revealed this thread:

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=204344

 

to add to the archived thread. the skunk manifold looks better than the ITR one??? says who??? jesus, if u have ever seen a skunk2 manifold the casting is far from flawless. then go take a look at a ITR manifold. casting is flawless. so if ur into looks, hands down the ITR mani gets it. if ur into performance it could go either way. dynos seen to have shown exact same #s. and if ur a penny pincher u cant beat the price of the ITR intake manifold. so ITR wins 2-0 or 3-1 depending how u look at it.