Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #1  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve.

For discussion's sake...When tuning an engine, which is better for power under the curve? What's best for peak hp numbers? I'm trying to get a better understanding, and I know there are numerous tuners on board the ITR forum, like sgT, CHEETAH, etc. Is it generally better to have a smoother crossover? I know there are a lot of questions, but I'm trying to get a better understanding about the tuning of these engines.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #2  
newt2's Avatar
INSERT TITLE HERE
25 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (WAFFLES)

It depends on your mods and tuning.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #3  
Chris N's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,274
Likes: 0
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (WAFFLES)

Smooth curve is what you want. As smooth as possible.

When you see a power 'spike' at VTEC engagement, think of all the power that could be made by moving the vtec xover to a more 'correct' spot and adjusting the fuel. You could gain all that area under the curve that was lost with the violent spike.

VTEC engagement isn't best at one spot, it depends on your setup: some cams like a higher xover, some don't.

Edit: Took out unnecessary ? mark.


[Modified by Chris N, 4:44 PM 1/30/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #4  
Big Phat R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 2
From: Kelowna Canada
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (WAFFLES)

For discussions sake - you need to specify which cams (at least) you are talking about.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:42 PM
  #5  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Big Phat R)

From what I have seen with Stock cams and light mods a lower VTEC xover (approx 5200 rpm) is best for the curve to reduce the dip.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
SUPERAUTOBACS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Chiba city, Japan / Vancouver, BC
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (newt2)

Also depends on the cars intended purpose. The ideal curve would vary depending on what sort of situation the motor will be running in....drag, low-speed autox, circuit, etc.
I think a smooth delivery throughout the power band, especially at crossover, would make the car a lot more driveable, manegable, and easier on the tires than a wild crossover.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (SUPERAUTOBACS)

Also depends on the cars intended purpose. The ideal curve would vary depending on what sort of situation the motor will be running in....drag, low-speed autox, circuit, etc.
I think a smooth delivery throughout the power band, especially at crossover, would make the car a lot more driveable, manegable, and easier on the tires than a wild crossover.
I can't honestly see the reson to have a different crossover for any application. Seems like one would want the curve with the best area under the curve and quickest power delivery.

Am I missing a situation you had in mind?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:47 PM
  #8  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Big Phat R)

For discussions sake - you need to specify which cams (at least) you are talking about.
Just in general. For different set ups, not just mine. I'm trying to be general as to get numerous responses for different set ups.

But for ***** and giggles, how about these cams, all on a B16A.

Toda B
Jun 3
Skunk2 stage 1
R
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:54 PM
  #9  
newt2's Avatar
INSERT TITLE HERE
25 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Asahi)

I can't honestly see the reson to have a different crossover for any application. Seems like one would want the curve with the best area under the curve and quickest power delivery.
That's the point of changing it if you have to.

I've got mine set at 5 grand and it still spikes at the crossover. I could probably go lower and get 2-5 extra lb/ft over a couple hundred rpm but driving around with it that low is annoying. I don't shift till just before 5000 under normal driving, and having VTEC cross over on every shift would drive me crazy.

Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:55 PM
  #10  
SUPERAUTOBACS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Chiba city, Japan / Vancouver, BC
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Asahi)

Also depends on the cars intended purpose. The ideal curve would vary depending on what sort of situation the motor will be running in....drag, low-speed autox, circuit, etc.
I think a smooth delivery throughout the power band, especially at crossover, would make the car a lot more driveable, manegable, and easier on the tires than a wild crossover.

I can't honestly see the reson to have a different crossover for any application. Seems like one would want the curve with the best area under the curve and quickest power delivery.

Am I missing a situation you had in mind?
Eh? I dont understand...did i imply that one should change the crossover point?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 01:57 PM
  #11  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (newt2)

Chris N...you said that generally with stock cams VTEC should be lowered to smooth it out. Now I have heard that the mugen program for the B16 was designed for stock cams. This program raises the point from 5500 to 5700. First, does anyone know if this was for stock cams; and second, does this increase peak hp by raising the crossover?

Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
newt2's Avatar
INSERT TITLE HERE
25 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (WAFFLES)

and second, does this increase peak hp by raising the crossover?
I don't see how it would. All it should effect is the area between the stock x-over and where you set it to.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #13  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (SUPERAUTOBACS)

you set the crossover point to where the cams make the most power.
more or less this usually means the lowest point at which the vtec cam can make power.
if its making power, that means its making MORE power than the non vtec cam.

So the answer is, as low as possible(within reason).
You do run into other restraints, such as you cant go much below 3500 due to
lack of oil pressure.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #14  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (WAFFLES)

how bout for a drag setup? you would want to keep it in VTEC the entire time, so I would imagine you would want more power up top and the Xover wouldnt matter as much, and, possibly it would be good to have a nice strong VTEC Xover?? just throwing stuff out
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:04 PM
  #15  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

more power is more power
does it really matter what you are doing with it?
i dono about some of you, but i would want the most power out of all parts
of the powerband.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #16  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (SUPERAUTOBACS)

You stated . . .

Also depends on the cars intended purpose. The ideal curve would vary depending on what sort of situation the motor will be running in....drag, low-speed autox, circuit, etc.


Eh? I dont understand...did i imply that one should change the crossover point?
Seems to me you implied that the crossover point varies per application. I was saying that it woudl tend to reason the most power delivery due to cross over would be specific to a motor regardless of application. If a car makes the most power at 5000 rpm crossover then why woudl one set it to 5200 or 4800 to drag race or change it again to road race? power is power.

Cam gears to affect where the power is and the tq curve is one thing but the Xover is just a dip and moving it smooths the curve and increases area under the curve. Seems this would be a set point per motor (varying per motor and mods)
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #17  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (sgT)

more power is more power
does it really matter what you are doing with it?
i dono about some of you, but i would want the most power out of all parts
of the powerband.
exactly what I was saying
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #18  
Chris N's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,274
Likes: 0
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Asahi)

more power is more power
does it really matter what you are doing with it?
i dono about some of you, but i would want the most power out of all parts
of the powerband.

exactly what I was saying
I agree with Steve too. It doesn't matter what application.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #19  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (Chris N)

i dont wanna argue, im just guessing. but i still think drag setups would be different!!! a smooth crossover doesnt matter...you would want to have as much power in vtec as possible. it wouldnt matter if you had a smooth xover or not.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #20  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

a smooth crossover doesnt matter...you would want to have as much power in vtec as possible. it wouldnt matter if you had a smooth xover or not.
you're right, it wont matter. but if you are drag racing you wont even HAVE vtec
in the first place.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:19 PM
  #21  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

For drag racing it doesnt. For autocross and/or road racing it is rather important to have a smooth power curve.

a smooth crossover doesnt matter...
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:19 PM
  #22  
Chris N's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,274
Likes: 0
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

i dont wanna argue, im just guessing. but i still think drag setups would be different!!! a smooth crossover doesnt matter...you would want to have as much power in vtec as possible. it wouldnt matter if you had a smooth xover or not.
You are just guessing.

Steve KNOWS.

Many other people on this board also know, and are not guessing.

Try it. Go to the drag strip untuned. Get a dyno graph of your untuned engine.

Then go buy Hondata or something along those lines, not just a VAFC. First of all, your dyno chart will look much better after tuning for a 'smooth' curve, and secondly, your car with be faster at the track, drag strip, highway, autox, EVERYWHERE.

Edit: I forgot. If you are above VTEC at the strip the whole time, it won't matter, But... tuning for a smooth curve would give you more power up top as well as low/mid. you would want to tune for that power, wouldn't you? That makes the smooth crossover issue kind of a moot point, IMO.


[Modified by Chris N, 5:21 PM 1/30/2003]


[Modified by Chris N, 5:22 PM 1/30/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:21 PM
  #23  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (sgT)

a smooth crossover doesnt matter...you would want to have as much power in vtec as possible. it wouldnt matter if you had a smooth xover or not.

you're right, it wont matter. but if you are drag racing you wont even HAVE vtec
in the first place.
not sure if thats a reference to drag race cars other than honda or not. anyway, i guess i should say you would want as much power as possible on the vtec lobe.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #24  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

not sure if thats a reference to drag race cars other than honda or not. anyway, i guess i should say you would want as much power as possible on the vtec lobe.
its all honda.
if you are drag racing, you would have no reason for vtec since you have no
need for streetablility. just need upper rpm power of the vtec lobe.
so reduce weight and remove the other lobes and hardware.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #25  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: higher or lower VTEC crossover. Which is better for power under the curve. (RTW DC2)

a smooth crossover doesnt matter...you would want to have as much power in vtec as possible. it wouldnt matter if you had a smooth xover or not.

you're right, it wont matter. but if you are drag racing you wont even HAVE vtec
in the first place.

not sure if thats a reference to drag race cars other than honda or not. anyway, i guess i should say you would want as much power as possible on the vtec lobe.
I launch at 4000 rpms with street tires so crossover in 1st gear matters to me. the smoother the better. (my xover is 5200)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
touintegra1
Acura Integra
13
Aug 13, 2023 08:28 PM
dustin jones
Engine Management and Tuning
2
Aug 19, 2017 09:05 AM
ItalynStylion
Honda Prelude
6
Aug 19, 2004 01:28 PM
ekvtec831
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
7
Feb 21, 2004 01:50 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:29 PM.