basically the question is as the title says. 14.57 w/exhaust, header, and cai? I bought my 00-1526 from ryan2000rless and he lied about some stuff and i'm pissed. i just wanna make sure nothing else was modified to car. thanks, any opinions would help.
-thanks
[JDM DC 4-1, carsound cat, dc exhaust, probably AEM CAI or something like that]


[Modified by nightrider, 9:28 AM 1/24/2003]

 

yes, seen a 14.2 with AEM only

 

wow, very impressive for only an AEM. thanks for your thoughts.

 

sure... i think i've seen 13's on here with only i/h/e

 

depends on your location. if you live at 5000ft elevation.. then I'd say hell no.

 

I ran a 14.5 with I/H/E @ englishtown........did a 14.3 with spoon rims and some more practice........my glove box opened by itself when shifting!


[Modified by JuzOmni, 12:49 PM 1/24/2003]

 

14.38 @ 98, AEM only.

 

Elevation is key as also the driver himself..... gl!!!!

 

I ran a 13.8 with CAI, JDM 4-1 and ATS on street tires

 

I ran a 14.60@92 bone stock at 1000ft above sea level

 

It's very possible that you can only run such times w/ I/H/C/E.

Why? Out of all those mods, your header is the one that really produces any HP gains. Sure, the intake and high-flow cat does help a bit, but it's not like putting on a NOS. ITR stock exhaust is very high flowing and you won't see that much gain w/ an aftermarket exhaust.

All in all, 14.57sec is entirely possible with your mods. Maybe you didn't get good rxn time and 60ft time.

Lastly, not all ITR's are created equal. A few have frankenstein motors and some might be a bit weaker than normal.

If you really want to test the output of your car, put it on a dyno. There is a concensus on this board as to high much a stock/modified B18C5 motor should produce on several different dynos.

-Sean

 

yep

 

 

I ran a 14.7 @ 1100 ft at the California Speedway with Intake/JDM 4-1 Header and 1 Recaro.

I ran a 14.7 @ 1100 ft at the California Speedway with Intake/Apex Catback/JDM 4-1 and 2 Recaros with a better 60' time.

I only had 2 runs in on the second trip so I think I could have improved it if I had more chances to run.

14.740 @ 95.020 (1121.27 ft. above sea level)
14.573 @ 96.113 (Altitude Corrected)

Check that link to see how you can correct your times.

 

I've run that stock....14.4 w CAI only

 

i didnt lie to you about nothing ,i sad i didnt have the stock springs or exhausts because they were at a friend shop. the shift **** was on my bros car and i told you i could not get it i felt bad and gave you another $50 off the deal to buy a new ****,not to mention i saved you how much on tax $650. anyways if you have ? about the car ask me dont try to give me a bad name over stuff i explained to you when you purchased the car . And yes the car did run a 14.52 @ 97 with the mods that are on the car. that car was perfect and never abused at all until your buddy wrecked it . i picked up the exhaust yesterday as well as the springs if you are interested in buying them i give you a great deal $300 takes all parts including ****, please just dont try to give people a bad name over shizznit like this.call my cell and we can talk .


[Modified by rp2000Rless, 11:08 PM 1/24/2003]

 

Sounds legit to me.

Besides, I never seen fast 1/4mi times from Seattle area from a stock/near-stock R.

 

RaginAngel on this board did 14.4 1/4 mile so with I/H/E you can do even better.

 

Haha...thanks for the props Ben...a lot of others have come up with these times now too....

 

yeah, more than possible.

I've seen people break into the 13s with I/H/E

 

Yes it is! I have run 14.5's at the track in my GSR back in 96-97 with just an Iceman race set-up, and with street tires also...

 

ran those times bone stock......

 

yeah Sgt is the only exception......

anyway aside from my intake the rest of my car was stock

 

14.73 stock on shot tires, So yes you better run faster then 14.57

 

I did a 14.46 with AEM only

I also got a 14.71 @ Fontana in California, but I missed 4th gear so I trapped at like 89.