180hp on the dyno what would that be in the quarter ruffly.
i have a 88si with a jdm b16 port and polished head,milled 20,000,skunk2 valve train,skunk2 manifold,ctr exhaust manifold,apexi vafc. just wanting a ruff estimate, 14 in wheels and i am using a j1 tranny.
Go to the strip and find out.
I mean really there are way too many variables.
...And with those mods I highly doubt you'll have 185whp.
I mean really there are way too many variables.
...And with those mods I highly doubt you'll have 185whp.
My HEAVY lardass Si went 14.80 on POS 16" street tires with 151 at the wheels <about 181-182 hp>.
On slicks, I'd imagine it would have gone 14.5's.
An HF with that kind of power would be a 13 second ride.
On slicks, I'd imagine it would have gone 14.5's.
An HF with that kind of power would be a 13 second ride.
bout this...good thing, but remember not many people have the skills like a pro or anything...
http://139.81.142.25/kris/kris/misc_...artermile.html
bout this...good thing, but remember not many people have the skills like a pro or anything...
bout this...good thing, but remember not many people have the skills like a pro or anything...
And other things are not perfect as well. But it gets the idea across.
yup...i prob suck when i go to the track and pull like a 14.9 or so...hmmm...still outruns mustangs and crap so im happy...made for the street
Trending Topics
Most of the track Mustangs I've raced have been built up. RARELY will you see a bone stock Mustang GT at the track.. Street, maybe, but usually, if they care how fast thier car goes, a 14.9 won't beat one.
You'll have lost going into 3rd gear.
You'll have lost going into 3rd gear.
14.9 is my estimate of what ill run on our sucky 1/4 mile track...ive beaten a gt mustang mid 90's style. if i had better tires or slicks i bet id hit 14.5 or lower w/ a full interior and stereo. a dodge dakota r/t didnt stand a chance against me either. i left him in 2 seconds and he was sson not to even be seen! no bs
the only way to find out is to do it, i think if you really have 180 whp, and you know how to drive than you should hit a 13.9-14.2. in my si crx, i maybe had 150 whp and ran a best of a 14.3. average of a 14.4-14.6
I've ran 13.3@101mph with only 175whp in my 1992 CX hatch.
...and that was with a 2.0 60 footer because the slicks would not heat up at all. I got a 1.8x with some M/T baby slicks on my last run and broke a clutch fork.
I'll have to wait until next time to bust 12.9@10xmph with a bone stock ITR swap.
...and that was with a 2.0 60 footer because the slicks would not heat up at all. I got a 1.8x with some M/T baby slicks on my last run and broke a clutch fork.
I'll have to wait until next time to bust 12.9@10xmph with a bone stock ITR swap.
Just to give you an idea,
My engine puts down 182 HP. Stock with a Mugen head gasket.
I run 13.4 at 105 mph. With that trap speed I should be runing in the high 12's, but I don't because I don't beat the car.
I kind of doubt that your B16 is doing 180 HP though.
My engine puts down 182 HP. Stock with a Mugen head gasket.
I run 13.4 at 105 mph. With that trap speed I should be runing in the high 12's, but I don't because I don't beat the car.
I kind of doubt that your B16 is doing 180 HP though.
Sure, but lets see that same engine put down 134 ft/lb. Mine does.
The proof is in the pudding
The proof is in the pudding
nice HP figure
, however dosnt that torque reading look REALLY low to anyone else? Dunno, but im pretty damn sure a stock LS has WAY more torque than that. HP figures are great, but it dont mean nothing without torque. Just an observation.
Cheers
edit:as i was posting Spaceballs got in there lol
[Modified by ZCcivic91, 3:47 PM 1/19/2003]
, however dosnt that torque reading look REALLY low to anyone else? Dunno, but im pretty damn sure a stock LS has WAY more torque than that. HP figures are great, but it dont mean nothing without torque. Just an observation.Cheers
edit:as i was posting Spaceballs got in there lol
[Modified by ZCcivic91, 3:47 PM 1/19/2003]
"I kind of doubt that your B16 is doing 180 HP though."
oh yee of little faith
less work
[Modified by efzero.com, 3:35 PM 1/19/2003]
oh yee of little faith
less work
[Modified by efzero.com, 3:35 PM 1/19/2003]
Neato, if the car and driver weighed 100lbs, and the car had 1000hp, you'd run a 2.879xxxxxxx.
10lbs and 10,000hp 0.28856 in the qm. I wonder what the 60' times are like.
10lbs and 10,000hp 0.28856 in the qm. I wonder what the 60' times are like.
To the guy who said the torque is low. That torque number is actually good for a b16. http://www.importbuilders.com apparently built the motor. They do good work.
Really? thats good tourqe on a b16? what are they stock? I was pretty sure the LS was around the 120lbs mark isnt it? That just seems REALLY low to me for a built b16, I thought they were around that number stock arnt they? Please inform me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tbone
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
3
Jun 17, 2006 04:57 PM
DC5_R
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
10
Jun 27, 2004 08:42 PM







