267 bhp at 9000 rpm from stock cams ???
Hey guys look at this B18C6 dyno.
http://www.alexwoods.it/it/integratyper.htm
Setup is full Mugen i/h/e, n1 ecu (JTCC?), p&p head, worked valves seats and combustion chambers, 12:1 c/r, 16° timing, 99 ron fuel, polished throttle body and intake manifold, stock bottom end.
267 hp to the flywheel al 9000 rpm (about 220 whp).
I'm a bit sceptic since I have never seen stock cams to pick more then 208 whp at max 8500 rpm .
What's your opinion about?
http://www.alexwoods.it/it/integratyper.htm
Setup is full Mugen i/h/e, n1 ecu (JTCC?), p&p head, worked valves seats and combustion chambers, 12:1 c/r, 16° timing, 99 ron fuel, polished throttle body and intake manifold, stock bottom end.
267 hp to the flywheel al 9000 rpm (about 220 whp).
I'm a bit sceptic since I have never seen stock cams to pick more then 208 whp at max 8500 rpm .
What's your opinion about?
Not a snowballs chance in hell. Probably an offbrand dyno that's horribly uncalibrated. My ITR put down 195 on a "DYNO-MITE!" mobile dyno at the Battle of the Imports. It was stock. take it with a grain of salt.
Maybe it is me but this dyno chart looks super cheezy
"Alex Woods" and the mythcal 270 hp on stock cams has been floating around for years. Even before Hondata, and stand alone management for the R, this was talked about.
I personally think it is full of **** ......... but rumour has it that he had totally rebuilt, balance, and blueprinted the engine and done that as a one shot deal, then blew the motor. But like I said that is all rumours ..........
I personally think it is full of **** ......... but rumour has it that he had totally rebuilt, balance, and blueprinted the engine and done that as a one shot deal, then blew the motor. But like I said that is all rumours ..........
Trending Topics
O.k. found this..
1 Horsepower = 1.0139 PS
which still shows high number 263 - and don't know if its corrected hp, and the name of dyno they're using.
1 Horsepower = 1.0139 PS
which still shows high number 263 - and don't know if its corrected hp, and the name of dyno they're using.
it could also be 263hp at the crank, considering 15% power loss to the wheels, it will end up at 223whp, or 20% loss at 210whp.. then again considering the type of dyno used and if its SAE corrected numbers.
I think that dyno graph is bullcrap.
the tourque wont rise that high up.
and it said PS on the graph.. which reads lower than hp... but i am not sxactly sure.. So it could be true but.... whatever
the tourque wont rise that high up.
and it said PS on the graph.. which reads lower than hp... but i am not sxactly sure.. So it could be true but.... whatever
"AW" affirms that he obtained so high results because of Mugen headwork specs that he had known direct from Mugen Japan.
Would be useful to listen sgt or other tuning master opinion.
Would be useful to listen sgt or other tuning master opinion.
What the hell is the foil thing and....
its reflective heat tape.
Look at the aerodynamics whoo hoo
one of my projects over the winter is an undertray.
isn't hp and torque supposed to cross at 5250rpm??? not 7500?



