Front Trailing Arm 89 Civic Spacer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2021 | 06:16 PM
  #1  
A415's Avatar
Thread Starter
Trial User
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default Front Trailing Arm 89 Civic Spacer

I replaced the front Trailing arms on my EF hatch with some adjustable ones, and I noticed the new ones only use 1 hole in the lower control arm. The original trailing arm used 2 bolts, and I've seen some other kits that have a spacer and a plate that allows the ball joint to use both bolt holes.

I attached pictures of the different setups, mine is the top picture. Just want to make sure nothing will break, this car is getting a turbo.



Reply
Old Jun 24, 2021 | 07:29 PM
  #2  
ohisofly's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 183
Likes: 63
Default Re: Front Trailing Arm 89 Civic Spacer

Just a heads up that what you're referring to are the traction bar radius rods and where they bolt to the front lower control arms - the phrase 'trailing arm' is generally only used in reference to the rear trailing arms on these cars.

What type of traction bar do you have? I'd imagine the second pic would be more ideal. Did yours not come with the spacers?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2021 | 09:39 AM
  #3  
Tyson's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,961
Likes: 76
From: I am Tyson
Default Re: Front Trailing Arm 89 Civic Spacer

i wouldnt recommend this style of mounting for the radius rod (aka strut rod, aka traction arm, not trailing arm).

it opens a degree of freedom of the main control arm able to rotate, creating more twist and stress on the bushings. it would be exacerbated more if you ran a front sway bar.

think of it also while braking and accelerating. this strut rod has a full rotation at each end, all the weight of the car pushing backwards or forward, its absolutely less strong and stiff than if it was double bolted like stock, allowing the rod to bend/bow more easily when compressed.

i cant say if it would break, or what the limit is. but for the reason of not properly constraining the control arm alone i wouldnt use it like this. but im sure the car would still drive fine.

a non-engineer clearly designed this traction bar. it may help for replacing the OEM front crossmember and allow more room for an engine swap, but its not better.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2021 | 11:04 AM
  #4  
Tyson's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,961
Likes: 76
From: I am Tyson
Default Re: Front Trailing Arm 89 Civic Spacer

alright, so given my rant on the design....

it looks like the OP's real issue is that someone probably lost a spacer and has one installed completely wrong on one side.

as shown in the first pic, its probably OK, but further from ideal than even as it was intended (second pic) being that it is in single shear. it doesnt change anything in the operation, just fatigue life.

like i said above, youll be ok, but its not good. find someone to machine an identical spacer and install it properly, or just ditch the traction bar setup completely.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stan L Harding
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Apr 18, 2019 07:50 AM
4drctr420
Tech / Misc
2
Dec 6, 2013 09:37 PM
nemesis25
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Nov 3, 2009 02:13 PM
Stadler
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
7
Jul 26, 2008 01:52 PM
iinvazionii
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
7
Jun 17, 2007 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 PM.