Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 06:41 AM
  #1  
scrambles2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

I honestly had no idea where to post this question. Just wondering what y'alls opinions were about the GSR's vtec engagement at 4500 rpm and the type r's vtec engagement at, I believe, 5600 rpm. Anyone prefer one over the other. Anyone feel 4500 is to low? Does it help having it kick in lower rather than higher? Anyways just wondering since 4500 to 5600 is quite a gap. Anyways thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 08:22 AM
  #2  
spAdam's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 921
From: Boat on a Hill, CA
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Different cams, different manifolding, different engine = different engagement points. It's not really an opinion issue, it's where the crossover belongs for each engine.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
hondamark35's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 127
From: Mustard Belt
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by spAdam
Different cams, different manifolding, different engine = different engagement points. It's not really an opinion issue, it's where the crossover belongs for each engine.
right. and the proof is in the <s>pudding</s> dyno graph.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 03:07 PM
  #4  
scrambles2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Well I guess is there any benefits of having vtec kick in sooner rather than later is what I'm wondering?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 03:31 PM
  #5  
spAdam's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 921
From: Boat on a Hill, CA
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

The correct answer is "It depends." You may find a little bit of midrange, you may lose a lot. You'll have to put it on a dyno to find out though.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 06:18 AM
  #6  
hondamark35's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 127
From: Mustard Belt
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by scrambles2112
Well I guess is there any benefits of having vtec kick in sooner rather than later is what I'm wondering?
Originally Posted by spAdam
The correct answer is "It depends." You may find a little bit of midrange, you may lose a lot. You'll have to put it on a dyno to find out though.
agree.

OP, it's a good question, but you won't find a good answer on the internet. get it on a dyno and see what the numbers say. move the engagement point around until you get as close to a nice flat torque curve as possible. it should be a relatively smooth transition from low cam to high cam.

again, if anyone tells you differently- gives you an answer other than "go to the dyno to find out" ignore them.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 09:18 AM
  #7  
darrinbrewer's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: northeast, tn, usa
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

way back, 13 year ago, I had a gsr, went to a chipped ECU, then added a skunk ITR style intake mani. with the ITR style manifold, and stock vtec at 4400, the car would fall on its face when vtec kicked in, then around 5500, it picked back up.

gotta remember on a gsr, vtec at 4400, with the LONG runners, then at 6000 the short runner opened up. a ITR or skunk2 mani, your on short runners ALL the time.

I found that 5300 was a typical good vtec point for most mild all motor builds that were NOT using a gsr manifold. 6000 was just too long on a wait, the power from the low cam was already falling of at that point.

This was my experience, I street tuned around 100 b series builds on crome, that's what im pullin my information from
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2015 | 01:42 PM
  #8  
v4lu3s's Avatar
RTFM
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,267
Likes: 4
From: Conroe, TX
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

I will agree with darrinbrewer, a friend of mine had a stock gsr that worked great with stock vtec crossover. when he rebuilt with a pr3 head, pistons, aebs manifold and much better header, plus type-r cams we found that a higher engagement point was needed. Honda did a pretty good job choosing the point based on the stock setup. If you change teh manifold or cams its worth playing with to see what works best...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2015 | 05:47 AM
  #9  
scrambles2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default Re: GSR vs. TYPE R VTEC engagement

Originally Posted by v4lu3s
I will agree with darrinbrewer, a friend of mine had a stock gsr that worked great with stock vtec crossover. when he rebuilt with a pr3 head, pistons, aebs manifold and much better header, plus type-r cams we found that a higher engagement point was needed. Honda did a pretty good job choosing the point based on the stock setup. If you change teh manifold or cams its worth playing with to see what works best...
Ok that's good to know then because it DEFINITELY will be built. Goal is 500hp so wish me luck
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lDanny
Forced Induction
10
Mar 10, 2005 09:06 AM
hcampsoldier
Forced Induction
29
Aug 19, 2004 07:17 PM
ALLphilthyDC2
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
0
Nov 9, 2003 11:00 PM
gsrallday
Acura Integra
7
Nov 7, 2003 12:14 PM
gsxr
Acura Integra
25
Aug 28, 2001 05:31 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM.