Drag Racing Drag Racing (legal) & Associated Topics

Kelford Cam Opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
Currahee Perf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Kelford Cam Opinions

Anyone using Kelford's turbo cams in anything SFWD? Comparisons? Opinions?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 05:39 PM
  #2  
ArniFPR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

i have no opinion on kelford cams but when i was researching cams for my turbo build almost everybody told me to get GSC T1 i recommend looking into them
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 05:55 PM
  #3  
Turbo-LS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,903
Likes: 1
From: South, Texas
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

I love my GSC turbo cams but not just any set of cams is one size fits all. It all depends on the setup as to what cams will work for you.

The GSC cams have failed miserably in some cars and in some cars they've performed well beyond expectations.

I can't give you my opinion on the kelfords as I have no experience with them.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
boosted hybrid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 2
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

We have the 176t's in our car. We picked up 20-30 whp at 40 psi and 300-400 rpm quicker spool compared to the Pro 1's. They have stock like idle, and seem to be easy on the rocker pads. Did a back to back test over the summer before a race, definitely impressed with them.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 06:40 PM
  #5  
SwappedTURBOegg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

T-176-B ?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 09:24 PM
  #6  
nonvtecallmotor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 1
From: MOBTOWN,MD
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

I've been using them for a few years now...By far the best cams that I've ever used and are the easiest on rockers and valvetrain. A few other teams have tried them with great success too.

With other brands of cams I'd have to replace rockers every few months. Now I'm over 2 years on the same rockers.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2014 | 09:24 PM
  #7  
swapit's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: VALVE DROPPIN,NJ
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Im liking them so far. Picked up more mid range over the skunk2 tuner2s. Idle not sure of I locked my rockers. But its around 1600to 1700rpm at idle
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2014 | 08:20 AM
  #8  
boosted hybrid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 2
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Part number on the cams is 176t.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2014 | 09:41 PM
  #9  
Currahee Perf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Thanks for the replies guys, definitely good info. Looking into kelford turbo cams for a sfwd setup and wanted to know what the general consensus was on the turbo cams.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
Currahee Perf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

I gotta say guys, I'm a little torn between the T-176-B and the 176-T Cams. I'm having a hard time finding a decent review of both cams that aren't totally biased. I'm wanting to find something that is good with E85 at the 900 HP range. A little insight would be greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 11:08 AM
  #11  
nonvtecallmotor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 1
From: MOBTOWN,MD
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

I'm confused by the lack of attention to details and prices on their website.

They advertise a T-176-A and a T-176-B for $680
They sell a 176-T for $795 which by specs is smaller
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 03:37 PM
  #13  
Currahee Perf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

what do you suggest, nonvtec? You say you've been using them but I didn't see any specifics to say WHAT you were using? I'm leaning toward the 176-T based on what boosted was saying about his experience with them.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 03:06 AM
  #14  
SwappedTURBOegg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

there websites suck
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 05:02 AM
  #15  
scmil95eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: miserable mitten
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Originally Posted by Natural Aspirations
I'm confused by the lack of attention to details and prices on their website.

They advertise a T-176-A and a T-176-B for $680
They sell a 176-T for $795 which by specs is smaller
Where did you find this?

Camshaftshop dot com is Kelford's "overseas" site. This is the best place to go for current info. 176-T is the current turbo cam, T-176-_ cams have been disco'd for several years.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 05:22 AM
  #16  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Originally Posted by scmil95eg
Where did you find this?

Camshaftshop dot com is Kelford's "overseas" site. This is the best place to go for current info. 176-T is the current turbo cam, T-176-_ cams have been disco'd for several years.
I found it on their website:


http://kelfordcams.com/applications.aspx
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 05:36 AM
  #17  
scmil95eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: miserable mitten
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Not sure how you're stuck on that old version of the US site, but if I go to that address and click on applications - there is no pricing, no T-176-A, no T-176-B...?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 03:14 PM
  #18  
boostlsveg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: carlisle, pa, usa
Default

So does anyone know the recommended seat pressure for the 176-t? I've looked at all the places that sell them n haven't found it. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 03:27 PM
  #19  
scmil95eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: miserable mitten
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

85lb. Camshaftshop.com, search KVS18-K.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 08:31 PM
  #20  
boostlsveg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: carlisle, pa, usa
Default

^ thanks
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2020 | 02:30 PM
  #21  
nixstix01's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 32
Likes: 3
Default Re: Kelford Cam Opinions

Originally Posted by boosted hybrid
We have the 176t's in our car. We picked up 20-30 whp at 40 psi and 300-400 rpm quicker spool compared to the Pro 1's. They have stock like idle, and seem to be easy on the rocker pads. Did a back to back test over the summer before a race, definitely impressed with them.
hey what lma did you run with the 176 t I just bought them today
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91tegrsjg
Acura Integra
3
Mar 4, 2011 07:18 PM
TurboGSR00
Forced Induction
1
Jan 4, 2004 01:25 AM
hks3630
Forced Induction
10
Jul 27, 2003 11:54 AM
28psiBoosted
Forced Induction
5
Mar 14, 2002 05:12 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 AM.