What would you do?
I recently purchased an ITR.
The car has no engine or transmission, however I do have a B18C5 block to build. The other thing is that I was in the middle of building a K24A4 to experience what legit all motor power feels like. I just don't know which engine to go with.
So, here is the question:
Would you build a nice reliable 200+whp B18C5? or
Would you build a monstrous 300+whp K24A4 instead?
What Would You Do?
The car has no engine or transmission, however I do have a B18C5 block to build. The other thing is that I was in the middle of building a K24A4 to experience what legit all motor power feels like. I just don't know which engine to go with.
So, here is the question:
Would you build a nice reliable 200+whp B18C5? or
Would you build a monstrous 300+whp K24A4 instead?
What Would You Do?
K series. If the original motor was still there then I would leave it there, but since you're buying a shell then it really doesn't matter anymore. Even if you replaced it with another b18c5, it still wouldn't be worth as much without the original motor and trans.
Trending Topics
I wouldnt say "resorting to the K" but how could u not go with it ?
I was ready to drop my coin on an 85mm b18c5 block and a head from rlz but for the same total investment , i picked up my k24a2 swap.
K24a2 w/ bolt ons 195tq > b18c5 fully built 165tq
As someone else mentioned, if the car had original motor and trans I would leave it alone, but it doesn't. So, K series here I come!!!
K24A4
Found in:
2003-2005 Honda Accord(USDM), 2003-2006 Honda Element
Displacement: 2,354 cc (143.6 cu in)
Bore and Stroke: 87 mm x 99 mm (3.43 x 3.90 inches)
Compression: 9.7:1
Power: 160 hp (119 kW) @ 5500 rpm (166 hp in 2007/2008)
Torque: 160 lb·ft (218 N·m) @ 4500 rpm (@4000 rpmin 2007/2008)
Redline: 6800 rpm
Cable actuated throttle
[edit]
So you'd REALLY have to build it for 300 WHP right? I'd go B18C5
Found in:
2003-2005 Honda Accord(USDM), 2003-2006 Honda Element
Displacement: 2,354 cc (143.6 cu in)
Bore and Stroke: 87 mm x 99 mm (3.43 x 3.90 inches)
Compression: 9.7:1
Power: 160 hp (119 kW) @ 5500 rpm (166 hp in 2007/2008)
Torque: 160 lb·ft (218 N·m) @ 4500 rpm (@4000 rpmin 2007/2008)
Redline: 6800 rpm
Cable actuated throttle
[edit]
So you'd REALLY have to build it for 300 WHP right? I'd go B18C5
Peak numbers are just that, numbers. I wouldn't focus on a dyno slip, I would focus on a reliable build that is fun to drive. I may be a purest, but I would stick with a simple C5 build with quality bolt-on's over any other option.
This is your car though. What really matters is what do you want? If you haven't already, think about what you plan to do with the car, now, and also 2+ years down the road. Regardless of the build choice, you want to make sure it fits your needs and wants now and a few years from now.
This is your car though. What really matters is what do you want? If you haven't already, think about what you plan to do with the car, now, and also 2+ years down the road. Regardless of the build choice, you want to make sure it fits your needs and wants now and a few years from now.










