who has done it

 

Honda has... JDM 1996 DB9 Integra Xi 4WD

94

 

no sh*t! u learn something new everyday.

 

although it is a shitty awd system, most people use the cr-v awd transmission since it bolts up to b series engines.

 

Research is your friend. But people love to waste bandwidth huh?

 

Pfft, this isnt team integra!


Yeah bro AWD came stock, but ONLY with D series motors. To get a b series motor to fit would take a little bit of creativity.

 

You will have to modify the entire rear suspension to make it work.

 

I was thinking, if you took that awd d series DB, and removed the front axles (put in plugs), you would have a rear wheel drive teg!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh0PUmNRiD4

 

yea and some of the ferio civics came awd

 

just when u think u have seen it all

 

That's fawkin awesome!! ME WANT!! Looks like it was that guys first time with it rwd haha

People used to do that with dsm's, made for one BADASS RWD 4cyl.

 

I have no idea of this would work and it may be a stupid suggestion but why don't you take the front suspension off the DA and put it on the rear

 

you could do that, its easier to just mount the engine in the back and make it MR

 

Make it Mid-ship Runabout? Mid engine you mean. MR (from the MR2) means midship runabout lol. Named by toyota, it is not a name for mid engine placement. Just sayin.

 

MR is short for RMR ( rear mid engine, rear wheel drive)

 

Why would a three letter abreviation need to be shortened, like RMR isn't short enough? And it's not called "rear mid engine", it's just mid engine, so basically you made up "RMR" and "MR".

 

cuz its a honda lol

 

Anyone else laugh at 0:10

Jesus, I cant stop smiling....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9Xhw...eature=related

 

so a mid engine rear wheel drive car and a mid engine awd car are both called just mid engien? NO, ones called MR (RMR) and the other is RM4.

do some research
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-engine_design

 

Yes because wiki is such a great place for info considering anyone can put whatever on there. It would not be called rear mid engine.
It's mid engine (in front of rear axle),or rear engine (behind the rear axle).
Don't worry I did my reasearch and I used ASE BOOKS, not Wikipedia...

 

lol, every body I have ever met who is "ASE" certified, is a complete moron and knows next to nothing about anything technical on cars, just how to change brakes and oil. Id trust Wiki over that.

and i dont know how you arent getting this, the "rear" in "Rear mid-engine" stands for where the engine is mounted.

Rear mid-engine, Rear wheel drive


Front mid-engine, Rear wheel drive


Front mid-engine,Front wheel drive


a mid-engine car is classified as such if its engine is behind the front axles, so even front wheel-drive cars can be mid-engine cars.

The Acura 2.5l rdx and 3rd gen Acura Vigor are both technically considered mid engine cars.

 

LMAO, another name calling know-it-all that can't get the simplest things right 94

 

I never said books for studying for ase's, I'm saying automotive books put out by ASE, you know, like every other book that a real shop owns? Something you wouldn't know about.

And once again, you just posted that up from WIKIPEDIA.

And yes, they are all called mid engine if it's between the two axles. I'm talking about engine placement, if it's mid engine rear wheel drive, then you call it that, there is no stupid fawking abreviation!. Get that through your head, Mr. knowitall

Let me make this clear for you....
There is- Front egine, - Mid engine, -rear engine. Can you process that? There is only three?

 

Who cares? I don't. Technicalities are for people who don't get ****.

Take your bickering into pm guys..... At this point, don't matter who is right, I come to honda tech to get away from arguments with my girlfriend and read about cars, and this is where I end up? CMAN

 

Lol good 'ol seb. I'm not trying to argue with this dude, I'm just trying to explain to him what is right. I don't like bieng called an idiot by someone that uses Wikipedia as their source of (mis) information...