just wondering if anyone has used this pump or have tested it them selves.

says its 340lph, but i was looking at aeromotive's chart and seems to me its slightly better then a 255 walbro at high pressures. just wanna see likes or dislikes or opinion's.

http://aeromotiveinc.com/products-pa...-inlet-inline/


thanks

 

There is a company on here that tested it and compared to other pumps. re-search it, its on this section

 

https://honda-tech.com/forums/showth...ump+comparison

Real Street Performance did the test.

 

The thread is somewhere in here. But from what i remember it was ALL GOOD results!

 

We are using one in my father's CRX.

B-Series, 84x89, 10:1, GT3076R.

Fuel setup consists of:
- Aeromotive 340 in-tank
- 6AN feed
- ID1000's
- FuelLab regulator

Made 520whp/392wtq @ 21psi on E85, with 74% injector duty.

Working pretty well! Much quieter setup than the Walbro/Bosch 044 combo we ran before.

 

not to shabby. what was base pressure?

 

80psi

 

80psi base?! Are you running that high to band-aid the 1000's being too small? With 74% duty cycle it shows it doesn't need to be that high.

 

The ID1000's are fine at that pressure.

 

So for boost application having base pressure set near around factory pressure is better(43psi) ??

 

520whp @ 21psi via a 30r... right..

 

I never said they weren't, but why run so high when not needed? That pump @ 100psi is way down in flow and its working very hard. I was just curious why.

 

granted this is on e85, and i can vouch for the car, its a pretty impressive ride!

 

OK, you caught me. It was 21.5psi.

And 520whp is about all it wants to make. I can turn boost up, torque goes up, but power humps right over.

I don't see what's so hard to believe about it?

If you want to see unbelievable: http://dynos.evans-tuning.com/2010/1...o-570whp375tq/

Lower octane fuel than what we're using, lower boost, and 50whp more, from a turbo that's rated for 525hp.