b7 swap wont rev past 6k

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 19, 2011 | 08:17 PM

hatchet_honda

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 1,884

Likes: 1

From: HOBART, INDIANA

b7 swap wont rev past 6k

i have a 91 civic dx that ive swapped a d15b7 into. pulled my b16 out and dropped this in to pass emissions testing. well it runs ok just wont rev past 6k. using stock b7 ecu. any ideas? no cels or anything

Feb 20, 2011 | 06:35 AM

KINGVEM^^ED6

Honda-Tech Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 15,766

Likes: 1

From: suck it easy,WA

Re: b7 swap wont rev past 6k

why would u need it to rev past 6k

maybe thats all the ecu will allow O_O

Feb 20, 2011 | 09:24 AM

hatchet_honda

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 1,884

Likes: 1

From: HOBART, INDIANA

Re: b7 swap wont rev past 6k

i searched and saw that it should redline at 6700. 6k makes this car slow as hell now and it irritates me when it falls on its face at 45 mph...

Feb 20, 2011 | 01:14 PM

blowingupjake

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

Re: b7 swap wont rev past 6k

My main relay was loose last week and I couldnt rev past 3k until I fixed that, Just throwing that out there.. I could be completely off.

Feb 20, 2011 | 11:41 PM

hatchet_honda

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 1,884

Likes: 1

From: HOBART, INDIANA

Re: b7 swap wont rev past 6k

she revved fine with the b16 in and using a p30 ecu. now with this po5 it sucks

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Need help bad!!!!!!! b16 doesnt have rev limiter.

demastus18

Tech / Misc

Jul 28, 2014 02:27 PM

p2t 7000rpm rev limiter?

98greensi

Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)

Mar 5, 2012 04:07 PM

jdm b16 in 91 teg won't rev past 7500

integraboy93

Acura Integra

Apr 29, 2007 06:31 AM

6200 rev limit?

tatmark1

Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)

Jul 19, 2006 01:36 PM

rev limiter

blackrex91

Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)

Apr 19, 2003 04:33 PM