Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Boring 1/4 track times....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:53 AM
  #1  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Boring 1/4 track times....



I'm on the right

Went last weekend and hung out with a couple of members from this board. There weren't a lot of people there and it was really fun. Did this run with JDM 4-1 header, 18 degree timing, comptech icebox, azenis @ 18psi. Power steering belt was removed with help from arnold and armon, thanks bros!

I slipped the clutch out until it grabbed @ 4000 RPM. Way better than last week's time of 14.9!

I really don't think I'm able to get a 2.2 60 ft. I just can't do it. And if I were able to obtain it, man, what would my 1/4 time be?


[Modified by [skafia], 10:54 AM 9/23/2002]


[Modified by [skafia], 10:54 AM 9/23/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:55 AM
  #2  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

.....must've been due to those heavy seats.

j/k bro - i'd expect about that from your 60ft... if you can get 2.20's I'd expect 14.5...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:24 AM
  #3  
Unlimited's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

i did that with my car 2.3 60ft time 14.4@98mph aem cai and stock everything else 2390lbs
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:35 AM
  #4  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

well that's cause your car is 23xx lbs!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #5  
Cosworth's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,402
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

well that's cause your car is 23xx lbs!
Unlimited's car didn't have A/C... it's not like it was gutted.

14.7sec is a pretty good time.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Cosworth)

98R's w/o ac weighs in at 2590 I believe. Shaving off 200 lbs is something! Yeah, I was happy with a 14.7 real happy, just wondering if it can be improved.


[Modified by [skafia], 11:47 AM 9/23/2002]


[Modified by [skafia], 11:52 AM 9/23/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:48 AM
  #7  
xjohnx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

14.3 with no PS belt, jdm 4-1, aem, and balding re010's.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
sneakychaos's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (xjohnx)

14.3 with no PS belt, jdm 4-1, aem, and balding re010's.
You aint got chit on me... 14.38 @ 98, all belts, no weight reduction including spare tire, and just an AEM...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 11:21 AM
  #9  
Unlimited's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Cosworth)

if it was gutted it would have been 2100 lbs
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 11:24 AM
  #10  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

then what did you take out to weigh in at only 2390?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
Unlimited's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

thats without me in the car with me its about 2450

no rear seat
no passenger seat

probably saved about 50lbs?

probably 2440lbs if i didnt take them out

with a 2.2 or a 2.1 60ft i probably could have cut 0.2+ on my 1/4 mile with the 98mph trapspeed i had
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 04:45 PM
  #12  
SoCal ITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

14.46 with no P/S, a timing advance and a CAI.

I also got a 2.15 60' on 400 treadwear H rated Potenza 910's, but it wasn't on that run.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #13  
WRXRacer111's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (SoCal ITR)

52.7@14.8mph, 115/20 Nikes, Ventolin-charged intake... You did ask for boring 1/4 track times, right?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #14  
itr-j's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: ITR, Haven, 1243
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (WRXRacer111)

45.5, in my adidas around the track
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #15  
Cozmo Kraemer's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, US
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (itr-j)

Who do you run for? 45.5 is damn fast, I did the Decathlon for ASU, 9th in the Pac-10 my best 400m was 49.0. And I thought that was fast.... 45.5 is smokin... you could have been on our NCAA 3rd place 4x4 team.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 12:52 AM
  #16  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

So your car without you weighs in at 2390, and with you weighs in at 2450. Man, you only weigh 60 lbs? No wonder! heh!
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 01:17 AM
  #17  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

if it was gutted it would have been 2100 lbs
Please share your secrets to get an ITR to weigh in at 2100 lbs.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 07:46 AM
  #18  
Unlimited's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... ([skafia])

So your car without you weighs in at 2390, and with you weighs in at 2450. Man, you only weigh 60 lbs? No wonder! heh!
sorry i'm 160

2550
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 08:03 AM
  #19  
Hooch'n's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 1
From: Notgrapebutgreat, S.C./N.C., USof A
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Unlimited)

1/4 does get boring.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 08:13 AM
  #20  
Asahi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Hooch at 8400-RPM)

ran a 14.22 @99.8 with my 2000 R with just an AEM.

My 98 best to date is a 14.6 with AEM and JDM 4-1. Nothing but spare was removed from eiter.

Onto weights posted. My R without me in it with 1/4 tank of gas and no spare weighs 2520 with AC. My 2000 R with a Carbon fiber hood, no muffler section and millenia wheels with bald V700's, no spare, less than 1/8 tank of gas and no back seats weighed 2440.

How in the world are you getting an R so low and what did you weight it on?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 09:02 AM
  #21  
SergEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: South Bay, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (Asahi)

See my sig 99 EK 2440 curb , w/ me 2590 lbs minus pass seat, no rear seat, no spare on BFG DR's in cool weather.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 10:01 AM
  #22  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (SergEK)

Well I just raced at the california speedway here in fontana and on their website the elevation is listed as 1121.27 ft. above sea level.

According to this website: http://gnttype.org/techarea/misc/altitude.html. for an elevation of 1200 feet the calculated factors for 1/4 are: .9874, and the mph is: 1.0129. I found that there's a correlation of .0013 secs between every hundred feet, and .0014 mph for every hundred feet.

I did the math with my best 1/4 time of (14.740 * .9887) at (95.02 * 1.0115) and I got 14.573 @ 96.113 Not bad at all for behing 1121.27 ft above sea level! ok, i'm going to stop now.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 01:34 PM
  #23  
B2FiNiTY's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 38,367
Likes: 1
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (skafia)

Your doing pretty good...I'll be there next time. With my 17 sec 1/4 times.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
sesk's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: glendale, ca
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (skafia)

which track did u run ur car at?, cuz palmdales elevation and track conditions are horrible..if ur around the so cal area..run it at fontana..
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 04:44 PM
  #25  
skafia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,300
Likes: 5
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: Boring 1/4 track times.... (EG6 SiR)

B2: haha rofl. Ok man, there won't be a next time until March '03.

BTW--this was done at the California Speedway in Fontucky, i've heard it's not the best of tracks.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.