All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

LS Vs GSR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 05:54 AM
  #1  
JDM-KIDD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Default LS Vs GSR

I got a 96 civic DX and i was planning on doing a SOHC turbo but decided where i live at every ones got a turbo car... ssoooo i wanna build a fast all motor car to beat OR keep up with the turbo cars...

Which do u think is better a GSR or a LS-v

If i was gonna do a GSR i was gonna do Poor mans type-R.... n if ls LS vtec..

Im leaning more towards a GSR cause its got higher compression allready... but just want sum other oppinions this is gonna b my first swap in MY OWN car and my first build in my own car

Used to help my brother with his B16.. all time... but i never made my mind up on wat motor i wanted n finally narrowed it down...
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 06:32 AM
  #2  
kyden's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,883
Likes: 4
From: CT
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

you're not going to keep up with any turbo cars..
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 06:36 AM
  #3  
ZTwentyH8's Avatar
I collect venereal diseases
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,636
Likes: 0
From: Swear to ME!
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

I'm not sure why you'd be worried about the stock compression.

If I was building an NA motor to keep up with turbos, I'd be switching out the pistons to get a higher compression ratio.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 07:27 AM
  #4  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Neither. You wanna keep up with the turbo B and D series, get a K series in a light chassis.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #5  
ballinthavx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, VA, US
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by TheShodan
Neither. You wanna keep up with the turbo B and D series, get a K series in a light chassis.
+1
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #6  
lunatics209's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: stockton, ca, united states
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by ballinthavx
+1
Originally Posted by TheShodan
Neither. You wanna keep up with the turbo B and D series, get a K series in a light chassis.
+2
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
DDTECH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 3
From: Baton Rouge,Louisiana
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

I've tuned mildly done ls/vtecs with pro1's that run neck and neck with 12 psi sohc boosted cars..just a thought.. most people think turbo is the end all be all, it surely is not.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #8  
ruffrhyder's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by TheShodan
Neither. You wanna keep up with the turbo B and D series, get a K series in a light chassis.
Serious, my cousin's stock k-powered crx runs 12.5
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #9  
h22crxpwr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL, ca, 91702
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by ruffrhyder
Serious, my cousin's stock k-powered crx runs 12.5
my stock H2b crx ran 12.1 at Fontana. I did switch to K however and made a crapload more power with a very basic build..

To the OP.. either an Ls vtec or a GSR is going to get worked by even a barely decent turbo car.

Go H2B or K!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #10  
DDTECH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 3
From: Baton Rouge,Louisiana
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by h22crxpwr
my stock H2b crx ran 12.1 at Fontana. I did switch to K however and made a crapload more power with a very basic build..

To the OP.. either an Ls vtec or a GSR is going to get worked by even a barely decent turbo car.

Go H2B or K!
I assure you a properly built ls/vtec even mildly wont get worked by a turbo car.

If you do a gsr, stroke it with a ls crank.. making it a 1.9.. go bigger then 81.5 go at least 82mm if not bigger.. no replacement for displacement.. food for thought.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #11  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by ALL M0T0R
I assure you a properly built ls/vtec even mildly wont get worked by a turbo car.

If you do a gsr, stroke it with a ls crank.. making it a 1.9.. go bigger then 81.5 go at least 82mm if not bigger.. no replacement for displacement.. food for thought.
If you can't do a K, this is a way to do it. QFT
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #12  
lunatics209's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: stockton, ca, united states
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by ALL M0T0R
I assure you a properly built ls/vtec even mildly wont get worked by a turbo car.

If you do a gsr, stroke it with a ls crank.. making it a 1.9.. go bigger then 81.5 go at least 82mm if not bigger.. no replacement for displacement.. food for thought.
Why not the b20? 2.0 FTW!

If I was to do a budget build I would look into b20 RS itr's 85mm and spend a good amount of money into the head. 250+ WHP guaranteed.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 01:05 PM
  #13  
1.5Slowmatic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,032
Likes: 0
From: Sykesville, MD, USA
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

who around here has turbo cars? its a RARE occasion i see a turbo honda and if i do its some ghetto piece of trash thrown together that looks like ****
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #14  
K7-1Ktrevor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,474
Likes: 46
From: Salem, Or
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

ls crank makes a gsr the same displacement as a ls.... 1835cc's not 1.9
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #15  
miked16203's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

i got an gsr with a mild build to the head and it runns hard i 've beaten b20 and lsv soo go gsr they are more reliable den lsv and b20 r hard to get unless ur buying new.. all motor gsr run hard and no need to buy heads and head gasket kits jus build it go pro1's all day h2b is nice but not cheap
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #16  
raverx3m's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 2
From: sea,WA in my car
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

82mm bore+ PR3 RSmachines pistons make it more than LS displacement and higher CR if you re going with pro cams you will need that.

but if you want to keep up with turbo cars it will cost you. no replacement for your wallet's displacement.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #17  
H2b-eghatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

dud youll be beating srt4 with a stock h2b.
they run 12's stock with slicks. they have trouble beating u unless the bump their boost. motor =5+tranny=5+qsd/evo kit=7=1200.00 but you also have to get motor mounts coustom headers alternator relocator **** like that .............
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 09:46 AM
  #18  
jdm Ef-9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: southeast., PA
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

ls, go bold and different, i turn customers heads when i show them my track car and show them the ls motor..... wont waist everyones time but its almost 580 hp... and its a ls...

jaw dropper......
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 06:44 PM
  #19  
kounmechou's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Icon4 Re: LS Vs GSR

Originally Posted by 1.5Slowmatic
who around here has turbo cars? its a RARE occasion i see a turbo honda and if i do its some ghetto piece of trash thrown together that looks like ****
that is so true man! its really rare for me to c a nicely boosted honda and "tuned"!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 08:19 AM
  #20  
newtron63h's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Default Re: LS Vs GSR

im going to have to say that the b20 is probably your best option here. they arent hard to find, pretty cheap, b16 or gsr head, and combined with a good set of cams, good compression, a lil porting, good IM, good header and exhaust, and a GOOD tune.........you will probably see 250hp(212-225 at the wheels). and all that wont take some enourmous budget either. find a good b16 lsd tranny(youll probably need that lsd) and you should be set.

also your power will be very progressive, instead of ALOT of turbo setups where they have nothing down low and then the power just explodes up high..........which means they might be losing grip. yours should be more linear so that if you are about to lose grip youll feel it before it happens and can adjust your throttle accordingly.

BUT lets not forget some other things there............brakes, tires, suspension upgrades cannot be overlooked. gotta have a way to control all that power.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
integGSR805
Acura Integra
3
Nov 27, 2005 12:15 PM
integralsdriver29
Forced Induction
14
Jan 20, 2005 06:18 PM
MooreBoost
Acura Integra
1
Oct 16, 2002 03:37 PM
tsjag17
Forced Induction
19
Jul 21, 2001 06:40 PM
dc516
Forced Induction
5
Jun 19, 2001 09:38 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM.