anybody with s tech's, are the front supposed to be higher? its been 2 weeks now, i though they might need time to settled, but the front is still higher. is this normal???

 

are the tires the same size? did you have fat people in the back seat when you looked at the car to judge the height?

I'm halfway serious with those questions.

 

LOL are they new or used? might be blown?


^ ha ha fat people

 

my s tech's were the same way my buddy said it cause there set up for a b swap, i have a built single cam but i dont know how true that is thou??

 

Is it possible you could have put the rear springs on the front?

Most lowering springs are made to where the front sits lower than the rear, so if you reversed them, there you go.

 

i had the ones marked front on the front and rear on rears so i dont know. right now im just running coilovers in the front with the s-tech in the back on kyb struts all around and it rides and corners good enough till i put my h&r's on

 

dude i was responding to the OP, dont thread jack.

 

pics? :D

 

With the d-series still in, it was like that. the front higher the rear lower.. and you have it right. after i put the itr in it was sitting straight.

 

I has S-techs in my 91 Hatch and the front was higher also. Sold them!

 

thats weird. thoe. why would they make the springs like that? oh well

 

its possible that they were made like that...my sprint springs are 2.50F & 2.25R drop but yet the rear is lower than the front so thats why i added coilover perches to raise the rear...!!!

 

i think its because you have to buy the hole package. not just the spring. you have to have their shocks and struts too, to make them even or to adjust.. so you can't buy different setups, you must buy the complete package maybe.....

 

EF Hatches can be decieving since the rear wheel well is not as tall on the body line as the front fender opening. Park on flat ground and measure to the jack point you might be surprised.

 

^true