Honda S2000 Honda S2000

Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 01:38 AM
  #1  
briangotti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Valrico, FL, USA
Default Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

S2000 with a high 14 in the quarter and 6.3 secs to 60? I've done a search with no returns unfortunately.
Thanks, B
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 03:00 AM
  #2  
gripek's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Murray, UT, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

From what I've heard and researched there were no signifigant improvements from 2002 to 2003, other than minor cosmetic ones. I have an '03 and my friend has an '01 and we're pretty even if not dead on the same.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 05:25 AM
  #3  
chubbylee240's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

the only differences is the speakers and the rear window from plastic to glass
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 05:53 AM
  #4  
SuzukaBlueAP2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 1
From: BeaveRun, PA, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

must have been the weight of the glass rear window that slowed the car down
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #5  
S2KILLA's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
From: Yeah IM from Jersey, big wup, wanna fight about, it, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

hahaha
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 08:09 AM
  #6  
Tuner Eddy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,715
Likes: 0
From: Alabama, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by SuzukaBlueAP2
must have been the weight of the glass rear window that slowed the car down
haha.

Who knows? Just get gears and it'll pickup that 0-60 time.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 08:27 AM
  #7  
Scotty Dosent Know's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,703
Likes: 3
From: SEATTLE SON!
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

The difference is the driver they got to test it that year sucked.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 09:29 AM
  #8  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

I agree, my 03 is slow....like it needs a turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
JDMF22B's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: San Pablo, CA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Didn't they do some cosmetic changes as well as the rear window? I don't think internally anything changed.

Do any of you 2003's have any approximate curb weights?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #10  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by JDMF22B
Didn't they do some cosmetic changes as well as the rear window? I don't think internally anything changed.

Do any of you 2003's have any approximate curb weights?
Changes have been covered like 1,000,000 times before, so lets not go into that. Curb weight ~2800 as I recall.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
njn63's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,672
Likes: 8
From: Michigan
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

If you're worried about quarter mile and 0-60 times I have no idea why you're looking at an s2000.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 08:45 PM
  #12  
chubbylee240's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by briangotti
S2000 with a high 14 in the quarter and 6.3 secs to 60? I've done a search with no returns unfortunately.
Thanks, B
"wow, you can read the brochure" -Fast and Furious Tokyo Drift

JP
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 03:12 AM
  #13  
gripek's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Murray, UT, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

They also added some chrome rings around the tail lights.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 03:36 AM
  #14  
B serious's Avatar
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

The magazine editor got more fat due to more minivan cupholder shoot out articles.

Driver variation, dude. Not to mention track or condition variation. No two runs are the same.

You should be able to run high 13s stock, though.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 06:00 AM
  #15  
allmotorfreak's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: CANADA, QUEBEC
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by njn63
If you're worried about quarter mile and 0-60 times I have no idea why you're looking at an s2000.
x2
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 08:30 AM
  #16  
Zaakro's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 1
From: Socal, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by gripek
They also added some chrome rings around the tail lights.
those were first on the 02
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #17  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by B serious

Driver variation, dude. Not to mention track or condition variation. No two runs are the same.
He launched at 4k and had to wait the extra second for the torque monster to get spooled up. Seriously, if you don't launch it at 6k and feather the clutch you're going to be in the 14s....maybe 15s to be dead honest. If I'm in 1st gear at 1500rpms and stomp it, I believe it takes around 15 seconds to get into 2nd.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #18  
chubbylee240's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

^^^ agreed. i raced a s2k boltons to boltons. he launched it around 6k. i launched at 5ish (maybe lower) i wasnt ready... but it was a VERY BIG difference, cause i spun the tires, then it bogged really bad. the other guy, raped me.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
phonedrn8's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

ahhhhhhhhhhh it fast enough for met to get from home to work
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:58 AM
  #20  
doubledeucehatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
From: taft, tn, united states
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

I launch my 2000 s2k at 6,500 or 7,000 it spins the wheels once or twice but doesn't bog and launch's really well.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #21  
90Rexx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
From: New England
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by doubledeucehatch
I launch my 2000 s2k at 6,500 or 7,000 it spins the wheels once or twice but doesn't bog and launch's really well.
2 rear tires ... 300 dollars
new differential ... 1500 dollars
the look on your face when it breaks from launching... PRICELESS
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #22  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by 90Rexx
2 rear tires ... 300 dollars
new differential ... 1500 dollars
the look on your face when it breaks from launching... PRICELESS
I really didnt understand what everone was talking breaking diffs for...and then I looked under my car I think my old 4 wheeler has a bigger diff....
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #23  
Scotty Dosent Know's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,703
Likes: 3
From: SEATTLE SON!
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Spinning the tires on a launch puts less strain on the drive train then bogging the car and having the tires catch. Hooking up when you dump the clutch im sure is a big jolt to the drive train
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #24  
JDMF22B's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: San Pablo, CA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

Originally Posted by 95 integra
He launched at 4k and had to wait the extra second for the torque monster to get spooled up. Seriously, if you don't launch it at 6k and feather the clutch you're going to be in the 14s....maybe 15s to be dead honest. If I'm in 1st gear at 1500rpms and stomp it, I believe it takes around 15 seconds to get into 2nd.
LOLOLOLOL!! I Smoked the other night, hopped in to go to the store (go figure right?), and thought the same thing. Could have read a novel before 3rd
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 10:30 AM
  #25  
CHONCH2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Norman, OK, USA
Default Re: Why is the 2003 S2000 the slowest produced:

all s2k's are turds.

unless they are 01' silverstones ;-)
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.