OK, just want to verify what I think is correct. I'm not sure though as I don't really mess with any 92-95's. Here is what I believe, please correct anything I have wrong.

1. 96-2000 Civic rear lower control arms are longer than 92-95 Civic LCA's
2. 96-2000 Civic Toe links are longer than 92-95 Civic ones I'm guessing? That's what makes sense to me but I just want to verify.

Reason I ask is because I have a person with a car that is big time negative camber on the back. At first, they thought they had EG/DC LCA's. However, I pulled a set of EK ones last night and went to replace them with EG ones so I could roll the car around. problem was, the EG ones were WAY shorter and I would have had to have ratchet strapped the car to get them back in their hole. I'm thinking they have the correct LCA but possibly a 92-95 toe link (if it's shorter) causing their negative camber.

Sound reasonable or am I nuts?