Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

JG Edelbrock intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
b19coupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Default JG Edelbrock intake manifold

I am looking for some input on this manifold from people who have actually dynoed. I am considering running this manifold on my all motor Civic. Currently running a Type-R intake. What's the HP/torque difference (if any) between the JG and the Type-R manifold on an all motor application? I know that each individual setup will yield different results, but I am looking for anecdotal info.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
.(Lazarus).'s Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

According to the shop I go through, the JG manifold flows as well, but not better than thier extrude honed ITR IM. Hope that helps
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 05:56 AM
  #3  
b19coupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (ATXhybrid)

Thanks for the reply, it sort of helps. My type-r manifold is not extrude honed, so I don't know how it will stack up against the two manifolds that you mentioned. I am looking for dyno numbers if anybody has some.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 07:31 AM
  #4  
.(Lazarus).'s Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

I'm not sure the actual hp/tq difference, but it is noticable, though mostly only at really high rpm. I would just see whats cheaper, the JG, or extrude honing the ITR. The only other plus to a JG is that it is set up for a bigger TB already. (65mm I think...)
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 11:43 AM
  #5  
Katman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,094
Likes: 6
From: PASADENA, CA, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

I am looking for some input on this manifold from people who have actually dynoed. I am considering running this manifold on my all motor Civic. Currently running a Type-R intake. What's the HP/torque difference (if any) between the JG and the Type-R manifold on an all motor application? I know that each individual setup will yield different results, but I am looking for anecdotal info.

I believe the JG/edelbrock manifold is mainly designed for Turbo application, by the looks of the short runners. I've seen it used on NA engine setups, but most of the motors I've seen them used on were basically full blown race engines that ran big cams like JUN 3's, Toda Spec B-C's, etc. If you're planning to use it for a daily driver setup, I think you're better off with an ITR manifold. I could be wrong about the JD/ED manifold though.....the time of my collected info was about a 1-1.5 years ago when it first came out; they might have improved recently...


[Modified by Katman, 12:44 PM 9/4/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 11:59 AM
  #6  
b19coupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (Katman)

The motor that this manifold would be going into is a B18c1 sleeved to 84mm with JE 12:1 pistons + all the bolt ons. Redline is at 9,500. Using Skunk2 Stage 2's which are pretty close to the Jun3's. Looking to pick up any HP/Torque that I can. I would be willing to spend the money if the JG manifold would give me at least 5 HP up top.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 07:04 PM
  #7  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

The choice between JG Edelbrock and ITR (or the very similar Skunk2) is really a matter of horses for courses. The JG Edelbrock is a full-out race manifold, which is designed to maximize power in the 7500-1000RPM range (as their ad states). But in this RPM range, I would not be surprised if output is better than the ITR (or Skunk2). After all, this large plenum, thick and short runner manifold was made to flow but not tuned for low RPM torque. The ITR (or Skunk2) manifold is a more street-oriented part, designed to boost power output in the RPM ranges used more in daily driving. So if you are building an all-out race car, JG Edelbrock is better suited to your needs. But for the street, stick with the ITR.


[Modified by StorminMatt, 4:06 AM 9/6/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 08:48 PM
  #8  
b19coupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (StorminMatt)

Thanks for the input.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 09:02 PM
  #9  
Chugger's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Culpeper Va
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

im sgT he has plots of his built motor with and with out the manifold and can tell you what you need to know
btw i saw that damn thing last weekend and its fkn huge man i was like wtf
but my skunk works for me
lata
chris
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 12:02 AM
  #10  
riceboy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Vail, CO, US
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (Chugger)

Like Katman said, its primarily a manifold for boosted applications, and as far as extrude honing an intake manifold goes, yes, it should have better flow bench results, since turbulene decreases the amount of time that it takes air to get from point A to point B, but on the other hand, giving up tubulence in the intake tract on an all motor is not neccacaraly a good thing at all, turbulence leads to atomization, which deters you from detonation and provides a cleaner burning mixture, greatening your chances to pass sniffer with ease, giving you better fuel enconomy, less stress on the motor, more accurate A/F and EGT reading from cylinder to cylinder and did I mention that if you design the head properly, there is more signifigant of a horsepower increase to be seen from a more homogenous mixture?

EDIT-had to fix some typo's and I thought I'd give this link to ya also,

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=214097


[Modified by riceboy, 9:06 AM 9/6/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 05:58 AM
  #11  
MikeSarr_GSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 1
From: Behind The Camera,, FL, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (riceboy)

thats my thoughts using the stock GSR manifold... quality power in the midrange with noted high end gains teamed with the right tranny... 98 JDM ITR... we will see... 180/140 would be fun with those gears...!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 06:10 AM
  #12  
b19coupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (MikeSarr_GSR)

I am running the ITR tranny-LSD and close gear ratios rule! Judging from the info that I have received, sticking with the ITR intake is the way to go. Losing significant power in the midrange is not worth small gains in the 7,000+ range.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
Ruby Civic's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (b19coupe)

I have both manifolds and have noted that the JG ported up to 70 mm to match TB very nicely. Don't have dyno runs yet but am going with that over the ITR mani....All this is on 12.5:1 built CRVTEC with Toda B's.there were some dyno comparos in one of the recent rags, but forgot which one at the moment..i think peak gain with the JG was, like, 14.7 HP or thereabouts.....
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 11:44 AM
  #14  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (Ruby Civic)

there were some dyno comparos in one of the recent rags, but forgot which one at the moment..i think peak gain with the JG was, like, 14.7 HP or thereabouts.....
Those rags are the LAST place you should look for information.

If i were you, i would stick with the itr manifold
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 12:34 PM
  #15  
MikeSarr_GSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 1
From: Behind The Camera,, FL, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (sgT)

2L+ needs a larger plenum, ITR could be a bottleneck for CRVTEC or built 84-86mm B18C, as you say the JG may be better for a larger displacement B series car
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 12:37 PM
  #16  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (MikeSarr_GSR)

2L+ needs a larger plenum, ITR could be a bottleneck for CRVTEC or built 84-86mm B18C, as you say the JG may be better for a larger displacement B series car
So you would think. Hell I thought so as well. I still got some more testing
to do, but for now, JG is losing to the ITR manifold in ALL respects.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 01:02 PM
  #17  
MikeSarr_GSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 1
From: Behind The Camera,, FL, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (sgT)

damn... hows that for over engineering your product
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 04:32 PM
  #18  
hatchy's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (sgT)

So you would think. Hell I thought so as well. I still got some more testing
to do, but for now, JG is losing to the ITR manifold in ALL respects.
Can you expand on this? You've actually swapped manifolds on the same car, and the ITR makes more power, better fuel economy, more top end, etc then the JG?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 04:38 PM
  #19  
earl's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,120
Likes: 3
From: Irvine, CA, usa
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (sgT)

Those rags are the LAST place you should look for information.
Yeah, that test was done by JG on their dyno. Guess who won?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 04:42 PM
  #20  
Ruby Civic's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA, USA
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (earl)

true, consider the source.. but i am going to give it a try and back up to the itr if that is the best way(powerwise).
still, steve, can you give data to support your statement re: itr vs. JG

scary venturing away from Honda OEM in general
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 04:54 PM
  #21  
obd2gsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
Default Re: JG Edelbrock intake manifold (hatchy)

So you would think. Hell I thought so as well. I still got some more testing
to do, but for now, JG is losing to the ITR manifold in ALL respects.

Can you expand on this? You've actually swapped manifolds on the same car, and the ITR makes more power, better fuel economy, more top end, etc then the JG?
I personally have the JG and Skunk2 intake manifold for my B18c1. I was about to have the JG one installed when my installer showed me dyno graphs of his race car losing hp using the JG intake mani , as opposed to the Skunk2 one. And then I saw the size of the JG intake manifold as opposed to the Skunk2, and was shocked. The skunk2 is PUNY compared to the JG. You probably have to rev past 7K or go turbo to get the best gain from the JG manifold. I don't think the Skunk2 would make more power if you were going ALL OUT, but unless you are, don't even think of the JG for the street...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
powercenter7
Forced Induction
5
Dec 10, 2004 07:45 PM
GreenR
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
4
Jan 3, 2003 06:22 AM
CRXTC69
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
5
Sep 30, 2002 11:14 AM
SilverEP3
Acura Integra
4
May 3, 2002 02:43 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 PM.