comparison between s366 and pte billet 6765
i'm still deciding on which turbo to get, i wanna stay t3 though, this car will be driven a lot on the street
i've done some searching, and haven't really came up with much
i was wondering if anyone has any comparison, or personal experience with either of these turbos
t3 s366 and the t3 pte billet 6765 non bb
any help would be appreciated
thanks,
Donnie
i've done some searching, and haven't really came up with much
i was wondering if anyone has any comparison, or personal experience with either of these turbos
t3 s366 and the t3 pte billet 6765 non bb
any help would be appreciated
thanks,
Donnie
im actually stuck betwen both of these as well for my built bottom end stock head h2b street car any info would help either 1 of us dont mean to thread jack... so BUMP for YOU
I don't think either turbos are ideal for the street. I have a 6765 and i wouldn't use it for daily driving. But on a side note for drag racing you can't go wrong with either. I think the 6765 is cheaper and that's why I bought it over the 366
my car is mainly gonna be on the streets just on the weekends messin around, and at the track
i've found both of them for a pretty comparable price
i've found both of them for a pretty comparable price
Trending Topics
So Shodan wats your opinion on the matter for both of us he has a bseris and i have a h22 which turbo all are in t3 and all are joural bearing, on cars that will mostly be driven on the street but still wanna go to the track on the weekend and run a high 10 lol aka right around 500whp on pump gas the s366, precision 6262, 6265, or 6765?
Last edited by JDM H2B EK; Jan 5, 2010 at 12:35 PM.
If you're going for 500 on pump. the 6262 and 6265 are plenty for that. you'll be surprised how they work. no need for anything bigger. i've seen people make over 500 on both turbos.
im making 630hp on 20 psi with a T4 62/62 on a 2.0 gsr
spool is amazing on the turbo.. ive made over 700hp with a 62/65 no need for a 67/65 for a street car
spool is amazing on the turbo.. ive made over 700hp with a 62/65 no need for a 67/65 for a street car
i'm shooting for 500 on pump and 650-700 on race gas
lag isn't too big of a problem, unless it was like the pt76 on my old hatch....10psi at 6200, but reved to 11.5 so the powerband wasn't that bad
this motor i will prolly turn to 9500, maybe 10,000, depends if the power starts falling off or not
after reading about bep's customer service, i might be leaning more towards the 6765
lag isn't too big of a problem, unless it was like the pt76 on my old hatch....10psi at 6200, but reved to 11.5 so the powerband wasn't that bad
this motor i will prolly turn to 9500, maybe 10,000, depends if the power starts falling off or not
after reading about bep's customer service, i might be leaning more towards the 6765
So Shodan wats your opinion on the matter for both of us he has a bseris and i have a h22 which turbo all are in t3 and all are joural bearing, on cars that will mostly be driven on the street but still wanna go to the track on the weekend and run a high 10 lol aka right around 500whp on pump gas the s366, precision 6262, 6265, or 6765?
the 67's on a h22 drive and spool very similar to the 62's on a b series. i have a cast 67pte h22 car strapped on my dyno right now as i type this and we are seeing 15lbs before 5k rpm. if your trying to make 500 on a street car, a little "lag" is pretty helpful. also for guys wanting to make big power on pump gas, i like to go with a little larger turbo.
it ultimately comes down to YOUR goals and YOUR driving style. the 62 will make more power than most people have the fuel system for in their street car anyways, but its going to take more boost to get there over a 67. the h22's spool turbo's very fast. if you want to be able to keep the car in 5th gear and step on it and have instant boost, go with the 62. if you want big power, big power on pump gas, or you are OK with downshifting...you wont be dissapointed with the 67.
sold a 6262 to a h22 customer a couple weeks ago, but the way he drives his car...the 62 was a better choice.
it ultimately comes down to YOUR goals and YOUR driving style. the 62 will make more power than most people have the fuel system for in their street car anyways, but its going to take more boost to get there over a 67. the h22's spool turbo's very fast. if you want to be able to keep the car in 5th gear and step on it and have instant boost, go with the 62. if you want big power, big power on pump gas, or you are OK with downshifting...you wont be dissapointed with the 67.
sold a 6262 to a h22 customer a couple weeks ago, but the way he drives his car...the 62 was a better choice.
For example... I have a t3 6265 with a .82 a/r hotside on my f22b1 sohc accord, journal bearing no less. It spools really well on my motor imo. In fact compared to my old t3 sc6152 .63 a/r... I gave up virtually nothing in spool, transient response seems alot better actually, and I am making a great deal more power even at same boost pressures. 600+whp peak. Hell I am making over 500wtrq @ 4800 on the dyno with this turbo.
I think the larger turbine worked out well for my setup personally but I was a little worried initially when I made that decision. After seeing the results, very glad I did. It may not be for everyone for sure and a 6262 might be better for alot of applications. I guess I am just saying the 6265 cant be counted out because of the larger turbine on some smaller than 3 liter or larger displacement setups.
I respect both of you saying 3 liters or larger on the 6265 as well informed but I will disagree partially as I think it can do well on some smaller displacement applications.
For example... I have a t3 6265 with a .82 a/r hotside on my f22b1 sohc accord, journal bearing no less. It spools really well on my motor imo. In fact compared to my old t3 sc6152 .63 a/r... I gave up virtually nothing in spool, transient response seems alot better actually, and I am making a great deal more power even at same boost pressures. 600+whp peak. Hell I am making over 500wtrq @ 4800 on the dyno with this turbo.
I think the larger turbine worked out well for my setup personally but I was a little worried initially when I made that decision. After seeing the results, very glad I did. It may not be for everyone for sure and a 6262 might be better for alot of applications. I guess I am just saying the 6265 cant be counted out because of the larger turbine on some smaller than 3 liter or larger displacement setups.
For example... I have a t3 6265 with a .82 a/r hotside on my f22b1 sohc accord, journal bearing no less. It spools really well on my motor imo. In fact compared to my old t3 sc6152 .63 a/r... I gave up virtually nothing in spool, transient response seems alot better actually, and I am making a great deal more power even at same boost pressures. 600+whp peak. Hell I am making over 500wtrq @ 4800 on the dyno with this turbo.
I think the larger turbine worked out well for my setup personally but I was a little worried initially when I made that decision. After seeing the results, very glad I did. It may not be for everyone for sure and a 6262 might be better for alot of applications. I guess I am just saying the 6265 cant be counted out because of the larger turbine on some smaller than 3 liter or larger displacement setups.
The capability of the 62mm turbine is more than enough to handle an F/B/D series with what the 62mm billet compressor can put out. They are very efficient motors and dont take a whole lot of airflow to make power. I actually had a discussion about this with a bigger name shop that insisted on the larger 65mm turbine, while I disagreed. Recently someone has put the 6262 and 6265 back to back on the dyno, both being pushed near the limit. They showed that there was almost nothing to gain by using the larger turbine, and lag was a big drawback.



