the older 88-93 5.0 lt.
lol

my friend owns one and talks hella ****

 

oh and his is all stock. and all i have is
act clutch
dc 4-1 headers.
cheap *** ebay exuast.
and aem short ram intake ha
DOHC V-TEC BABY!!! FTW!

 

Check on YouTube. Those videos are tr00f!

 

 

oh and mine is a 99

 

hes got Hp and torque on you but you have weight on him. Race him and find out.

 

Race and video.

 

i mean u shouldnt ask. u should go for it dude. SMOKE HIM! n then show us the vid lol

 

haha i will soon. its hard to find time cuz we both work gay *** hours lol.
but in do time...in do time haha

 

Em1's aren't that fast. Dont get too excited.

 

sheiittt ide woop any car you own fool

 

I drive an em1.

 

yea hey run 16 1/4's or high 15's

 

if you get a good launch, you should be able to get him out the hole, but i think he's gonna have too much torque for you to stay ahead past the 1/8

 

gut ur interior and give urself the best chance and make sure to get a good launch, it also depends a lot on whos the better driver not only the car

 

+1 the driver mod always outperforms the hp mod

 

The '99 Civic Si does the 0-60 in about 7.5 seconds and the quarter mile in about 15.7 seconds.

In comparision, the '87-'93 5.0 LX and GT Mustangs do the 0-60 in anywhere from about 8.0 seconds to 6.2 seconds (the '93 Cobra does it in 5.9 seconds).

The '87-'93 5.0 LX and GT Mustangs do the quarter mile in anywhere from about 16.1 seconds to 14.4 seconds.

The Mustangs will have torque on their side. They will almost definitely get you off the line.

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

1999 Honda Civic Si
0-60 mph: 7.5 sec
1/4 mile: 15.7 sec

Ford Mustang LX 5.0
1990
0-60 mph: 6.2 sec
1/4 mile: 14.8 sec
1992
0-60 mph: 6.4 sec
1/4 mile: 14.9 sec

Ford Mustang GT
1987
0-60 mph: 6.4 sec
1/4 mile: 14.4 sec
1988
0-60 mph: 6.4 sec
1/4 mile: 15.0 sec
1989 with manual transmission
0-60 mph: 6.2 sec
1/4 mile: 14.8 sec
1991
0-60 mph: 7.3 sec
1/4 mile: 15.6 sec
1993 with automatic transmission
0-60 mph: 8.0 sec
1/4 mile: 16.1 sec

Ford Mustang Cobra
1993
0-60 mph: 5.9 sec
1/4 mile: 14.5 sec

'87-'93 Mustangs curb weight is between 2,743 and 3,350 pounds. The Civic Si's weight is between 2,601 and 2,612 pounds. So the Mustang weighs at least 131 pounds more.

So it looks like it's going to be close for some of them, but all the numbers I have show the Mustang beating the Civic unless the Mustang has an automatic transmission. I honestly doubt I'd see too many stock Si coupes beating stock Mustangs with the five liters. Even with mods on both cars, the Mustang makes power a lot easier and cheaper.

 

hahaha b16 vs 5.0... u may and i mean may get him off that line but dud hes gonna spank the **** out of u.those cars put alot down. i know this cuz my boy had one and we raced my buddys cx b16 modded. both very good drivers but that 5.0 has to much on us. i love our engines and what they are capable of but yours isnt very moded just bolt ons..

 

Not in straight line.

 

i think you would if your a good driver gl

 

I can't really believe this thread exists. A 5.0 will certainly punish you. That's the whole point of them. They are fast off the line. They jump to life.

 

Yeah American V8s are made for the drag strip. Challenge him to some autocross.

 

lmfao.. 'stangs all day! pretty sure his 88 would beat your 99, and even if it didn't, which it should, you've got 11 years of technology and "newness"

 

i beat one in my d16z6 hatch at an 1/8 track.

but it woulda stomped me in the 1/4 as it was catching up pretty quick

the driver spun the tires at the line and i didnt thats why i beat it.

em1 should be a bit faster so you might stand a chance. it all comes up to the driver

 

99 si
160 HP @ 7600 RPM 111 ft/lb @ 7000 RPM

93 stang

205 HP @ 4200 RPM 275 ft/lb @ 3000 RPM

unno, do the math ;