LS crank in a B18C5?
actually ls rods are longer then type r rods.....so u would have a problem with that....as far as the rest imnot sure
LS rods are SHORTER than GSR/ITR rods.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sgT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WHere do you people get your information from?
LS rods are SHORTER than GSR/ITR rods.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.
LS rods are SHORTER than GSR/ITR rods.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by miller.91.HB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Think about it. Two blocks with the same deck height. They use pistons with pretty much the same compression height. The one with the longer stroke absolutely positively has to use shorter rods.
Think about it. Two blocks with the same deck height. They use pistons with pretty much the same compression height. The one with the longer stroke absolutely positively has to use shorter rods.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by miller.91.HB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.</TD></TR></TABLE>
People get lulled into thinking that just because the B18B's crank has a longer stroke that the rods have to be longer also.
Modified by ITRbroham at 7:29 PM 10/17/2005
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.</TD></TR></TABLE>
People get lulled into thinking that just because the B18B's crank has a longer stroke that the rods have to be longer also.
Modified by ITRbroham at 7:29 PM 10/17/2005
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by miller.91.HB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.</TD></TR></TABLE>
holy batman digging up old threads from SGT who never posts on this board anymore
Is this actually true, can anyone actually back that info up? I always thought oposite.</TD></TR></TABLE>
holy batman digging up old threads from SGT who never posts on this board anymore
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kendall »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Think about it. Two blocks with the same deck height. They use pistons with pretty much the same compression height. The one with the longer stroke absolutely positively has to use shorter rods.</TD></TR></TABLE>
After seeing this and reading what you said that really makes sense. Thanks.
After seeing this and reading what you said that really makes sense. Thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Bradstard, I saw somewhere saying that you had a 2.0 liter? Is that with the LS crank? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes he is running a 85x89 setup
Yes he is running a 85x89 setup
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Skinny Stevestard »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes he is running a 85x89 setup
</TD></TR></TABLE>
85mm piston with an 89mm stroke? That makes 2.0?
</TD></TR></TABLE>85mm piston with an 89mm stroke? That makes 2.0?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sgT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ac tually ls rods are longer then type r rods.....so u would have a problem with that....as far as the rest imnot sure<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
WHere do you people get your information from?
LS rods are SHORTER than GSR/ITR rods.</TD></TR></TABLE>
in one of the old tuning books, the section where people write in to ask questions in the back, in one of the answers asked by a subscriber they gave all the b series rod lengths. and im pretty sure the ls rods were the longest. and they are the same as the d series non vtec rods. but im just a noob what do i know.
WHere do you people get your information from?
LS rods are SHORTER than GSR/ITR rods.</TD></TR></TABLE>
in one of the old tuning books, the section where people write in to ask questions in the back, in one of the answers asked by a subscriber they gave all the b series rod lengths. and im pretty sure the ls rods were the longest. and they are the same as the d series non vtec rods. but im just a noob what do i know.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
85mm piston with an 89mm stroke? That makes 2.0?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't remember the exact displacement, but it's a tick over 2.0L. The B20 block is an 84x89.
85mm piston with an 89mm stroke? That makes 2.0?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't remember the exact displacement, but it's a tick over 2.0L. The B20 block is an 84x89.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This is how I am thinking.
B20 = LS crank
84mm = LS/GSR/ITR pistons
85mm = B20 pistons
If all above equations are true, wouldnt
84.5mm pistons = 1.9?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
LS/GSR/ITR pistons are 81mm.
B20 pistons are 84mm.
B20 = LS crank
84mm = LS/GSR/ITR pistons
85mm = B20 pistons
If all above equations are true, wouldnt
84.5mm pistons = 1.9?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
LS/GSR/ITR pistons are 81mm.
B20 pistons are 84mm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mfoehrkolb
Acura Integra
11
Nov 21, 2007 05:37 PM
TurboEH2
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Apr 2, 2005 11:15 AM





