power loss with 4-2-1 headers?
really? forgot to mention im talking jdm type rs not sure about yall
i think these are what ill use;

im thinking more bottom end power? lol like i need it i have a b20 bottom and a few mods, tyres spinning all over the damn place, lol
id like a dyno figure still... nothing really, to ask... lol
i think these are what ill use;
im thinking more bottom end power? lol like i need it i have a b20 bottom and a few mods, tyres spinning all over the damn place, lol
id like a dyno figure still... nothing really, to ask... lol
My 96 spec JDM ITR swap came with the 4-2-1 header. Due to the fact that it is heavy and ugly I went to the JDM 4-1 ITR header. I weighed them both for the hell of it and the 4-1 is 8.5 lbs lighter. I honestly couldnt tell a difference in performance.
as far as i know, there isn't a performance difference. the 98+ motor has a slightly better torque curve. i just have no idea if that came from an ecu map tweak or the header. the 96-97 header is like the bargain header of all times. you can get one for $150 all day and they actually perform
Trending Topics
as far as i know, there isn't a performance difference. the 98+ motor has a slightly better torque curve. i just have no idea if that came from an ecu map tweak or the header. the 96-97 header is like the bargain header of all times. you can get one for $150 all day and they actually perform
A built B20 setup would benifit greatly from a larger primary header, a little JDM 4-2-1 or even a 4-1 would give OK gains, but a nice B20 header would yeld some great numbers if it was tuned.
I would almost agree with you, but just doing a valve adjustment to the tightest spec gives you some noticable gains which will show on a dyno, so even 3 degrees yields a small gain. Here is an old post with all the Cams out there for B series, the duration spread starts at about 3 degrees between levels and goes up from there. lift does not substantially increase as the threat of slapping a valve to a piston is already an issue.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/acura-integra-type-r-8/98-itr-ctr-intake-cam-%3D-zooommm-1388379/
OP, to your original question, I still think you would see a power loss with a 4-2-1 from a 4-1 as you are running a b20 bottom end. Big tube headers give some good gains on a B20 hybrid motor, and choking it down with a 4-2-1 will decrease performance IMO.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/acura-integra-type-r-8/98-itr-ctr-intake-cam-%3D-zooommm-1388379/
OP, to your original question, I still think you would see a power loss with a 4-2-1 from a 4-1 as you are running a b20 bottom end. Big tube headers give some good gains on a B20 hybrid motor, and choking it down with a 4-2-1 will decrease performance IMO.
Last edited by SlapSmak; Sep 2, 2009 at 01:39 PM.
Yep, consider that although 3 degrees seems small, it allows 1.4 % more fuel/air into the chamber on any given stroke, so that would give you a slight increase in available charge, giving you about the same change in HP, maybe 2-3 between the 96 spec to the 98 spec.
If I was going the Cam route, I would go Jun stage 2-ish if I could find em.
Yep, consider that although 3 degrees seems small, it allows 1.4 % more fuel/air into the chamber on any given stroke, so that would give you a slight increase in available charge, giving you about the same change in HP, maybe 2-3 between the 96 spec to the 98 spec.
If I was going the Cam route, I would go Jun stage 2-ish if I could find em.
If I was going the Cam route, I would go Jun stage 2-ish if I could find em.
that 3deg is only @1mm, total duration i thought was unchanged. also, for the jdm motors, more than a few places mention the cams being the same 96-01, i know the us cars got the ctr cam in late production but i have never been able to confirm it on jdm. personally, i can't see how such a tiny cam difference could bring on much of anything. even going to skunk1's which are larger than either rarely gets anyone more than 3-5hp over plain itrs
the ecu or header i could see easily creating the better torque curve which is all the 98+ has. there is no hp difference
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRAZY-EG9
Tech / Misc
2
Jul 20, 2010 04:36 PM
TeachHist2005
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
42
Nov 11, 2003 05:38 AM
Rratedcivichatch
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
Dec 26, 2002 10:43 AM



b8.5lbs lighter? 
