Rotating assembly balancing?
I've got a build I'm assembly for a friend. He took his block, crank, rods, pistons and harmonic balancer to a machine shop. He didn't have his lightened flywheel or clutch yet, so the machine shop balanced the rotating assembly with just the harmonic balancer. Can the rotating assembly be balanced correctly without the flywheel? I know the flywheels are internally balanced but won't the front to back weight be affected by not having the flywheel and clutch attached?
The machinist I usually go to always ask for the flywheel, clutch assembly, rings and bearings when he balances my assemblies.
The machinist I usually go to always ask for the flywheel, clutch assembly, rings and bearings when he balances my assemblies.
Does front to back weight even come into play? If that is the case than the flywheel end of any engine would most likely be a good deal heavier.
I've always been curious of how they go about balancing a IL-4. My old machinist told me it is somewhat eaiser than a V6/V8 and that bobweights aren't used. Can anyone elaborate?
I've always been curious of how they go about balancing a IL-4. My old machinist told me it is somewhat eaiser than a V6/V8 and that bobweights aren't used. Can anyone elaborate?
Does front to back weight even come into play? If that is the case than the flywheel end of any engine would most likely be a good deal heavier.
I've always been curious of how they go about balancing a IL-4. My old machinist told me it is somewhat eaiser than a V6/V8 and that bobweights aren't used. Can anyone elaborate?
I've always been curious of how they go about balancing a IL-4. My old machinist told me it is somewhat eaiser than a V6/V8 and that bobweights aren't used. Can anyone elaborate?
For grocerry getters, +/- 1 gram is acceptable.
I'm still fuzzy on the concept. I guess I just don't understand why the weight of the pistons and rods isn't necessary when balancing the crank. I know one of the major differences on a V8 crank is that there are 4 crank pin angles @90* angles. (not sure if that's the right terminology) Where on a I-4 there are only 2 180* apart. Correct? But then there are also flat plane V8s. They use a crank similar to a I-4, would they share the same balancing characteristics as an I-4. Found a good website that shows different types of crankshafts if anyone is interested. Crankshaft Designs That's where I got most of the info from.
yes it is a good idea to balance the damper, flywheel and clutch along w/ the crankshaft. together or seperate, either is fine.
balance the rods/pistons to match by weight
good aftermarket rods/pistons are usually dead on and wont need adjustment.
i have found brand new oem honda dampers to be out of balance, always a good idea to check them.
balance the rods/pistons to match by weight
good aftermarket rods/pistons are usually dead on and wont need adjustment.
i have found brand new oem honda dampers to be out of balance, always a good idea to check them.
Trending Topics
I'm still fuzzy on the concept. I guess I just don't understand why the weight of the pistons and rods isn't necessary when balancing the crank. I know one of the major differences on a V8 crank is that there are 4 crank pin angles @90* angles. (not sure if that's the right terminology) Where on a I-4 there are only 2 180* apart. Correct? But then there are also flat plane V8s. They use a crank similar to a I-4, would they share the same balancing characteristics as an I-4. Found a good website that shows different types of crankshafts if anyone is interested. Crankshaft Designs That's where I got most of the info from.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alowe336
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
2
Mar 19, 2017 07:29 PM
trecool44
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
May 20, 2007 07:15 AM
pentaq
Honda Prelude
2
Apr 29, 2003 04:36 AM




