I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere, Va, US
I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better.
Dynoed a baseline of 150Hp and 110torque with AEM, DC 4-1, 5 Zigen Exhaust, Cam gears, and a FPR. After tuning we got it up to 164 and 118 and it was done on a dynojet. I will post the dyno sheets later but I would think that it would be closer to the 180 range. Any ideas? The power jumped up from moving the intake cam to +4 the exhaust cam really didn't affect the car either way. I had the FPR set to 42psi and played with that but initially it was running to rich and after all the tuning I still seem to have A/F problems.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
From: Land of Oz, KS
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (TypeR-R6)
164/118 sound like STOCK numbers. I don't think the DynoJet's vary by that much...I hope you didn't get a weak motor. 
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: T.O./VA
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (TypeR-R6)
I noticed you're from VA. I think the weather might have a little something to do with your less than par numbers. I say wait till it gets a little cooler to diminish the effects of heatsoak. Where in VA are you located if you don't mind sharing.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere, New York, USA
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (TypeR-R6)
Was that corrected for temperature, barometric air pressure and /or humidity?
If not, do you recall what the weather was like that day? It makes a huge difference.
John
If not, do you recall what the weather was like that day? It makes a huge difference.
John
Trending Topics
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
From: up yours
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (Racebrewer)
here are my numbers
this was done in boston in the month of july. the temp was well over 80 F and the humidity was....welll you know how boston is, if you dont its like ASIA in the summertime. anyway, those numbers are really low with all those mods on there. how old is your ride? how many miles on the motor? what year?
jope things work out for you
this was done in boston in the month of july. the temp was well over 80 F and the humidity was....welll you know how boston is, if you dont its like ASIA in the summertime. anyway, those numbers are really low with all those mods on there. how old is your ride? how many miles on the motor? what year?
jope things work out for you
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere, Va, US
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (up-youRs)
The temperature was about 95 with humidity that felt like 110. It was done in Va. Beach at Abacus Racing. The run was not corrected for temperature. We set the intake cam at +6 and the torque and Hp increased around 20Hp between 3k and 6k but the when you looked at the a/f graph there was a break in the line at about 6.5k and the tuner said that we should set it back to +4 because of that. The car has 36k miles on it.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Indo R, Indonesia
Re: I finally put it on the dyno and it could have been better. (TypeR-R6)
seemed low for a DynoJet number..
on a Cool day, most of Pittsburgh Stock ITRs put down 153-157 WHP..
on a Hot day, 145-150 WHP..
That's on a Mustang Dyno..
on a Cool day, most of Pittsburgh Stock ITRs put down 153-157 WHP..
on a Hot day, 145-150 WHP..
That's on a Mustang Dyno..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZC'n'it
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
Oct 14, 2002 01:40 PM