Lowered car Aligment good?
Is this good aligment?
lowered on h&r racing with kyb
99 Civic Si MR
Left front , right front
camber -1.2 , -0.7
caster 1.2 , 1.3
toe 0.07 , 0.05
left rear , right rear
camber -2.4 , -2.5
toe .11 , 0.07
are these numbers good? I don't know what they mean.
Modified by inthad at 6:51 PM 7/31/2008
lowered on h&r racing with kyb
99 Civic Si MR
Left front , right front
camber -1.2 , -0.7
caster 1.2 , 1.3
toe 0.07 , 0.05
left rear , right rear
camber -2.4 , -2.5
toe .11 , 0.07
are these numbers good? I don't know what they mean.
Modified by inthad at 6:51 PM 7/31/2008
looks like front and rear camber numbers are mixed up lol
semms like the front would have more negative camber angle. also some toe out (more than the rear)
the rear camber should be failry small and very small amount of toe in - or zero.
in my opinion
semms like the front would have more negative camber angle. also some toe out (more than the rear)
the rear camber should be failry small and very small amount of toe in - or zero.
in my opinion
yea, this is the reading after the aligment. Firestone lifetime aligment and its the only one that can do the car. B/c it has a drive in and not a ramp. Its low. I have ingall rear and skunk2 camber it.
Should they be able to do it.
Should they be able to do it.
Trending Topics
Needs more negative front camber, less negative rear camber, and less toe-in at all four corners.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VTECIntegra9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks like front and rear camber numbers are mixed up lol
semms like the front would have more negative camber angle. also some toe out (more than the rear)</TD></TR></TABLE>
No. '96-00 Civics have a revised rear camber curve that is much more aggressive than earlier Civics and Integras. The rear gains negative camber much faster than the front, as seen in many new generation Hondas.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VTECIntegra9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks like front and rear camber numbers are mixed up lol
semms like the front would have more negative camber angle. also some toe out (more than the rear)</TD></TR></TABLE>
No. '96-00 Civics have a revised rear camber curve that is much more aggressive than earlier Civics and Integras. The rear gains negative camber much faster than the front, as seen in many new generation Hondas.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tyson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what are the factory specs on the printout?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont know the stock spec
I also don't know why the guy at firestone did that? I mean, maybe he doesnt know how to do a lowered car alignment.
So what do I go? go to another shop? or go in again to request the spec I want?
Please let me know, i don't want to ride in this condition long.
I also don't know why the guy at firestone did that? I mean, maybe he doesnt know how to do a lowered car alignment.
So what do I go? go to another shop? or go in again to request the spec I want?
Please let me know, i don't want to ride in this condition long.
if its firestone lifetime alignment, g oback and tell them to check it again.
and the stock ranges are posted in the alignment sheet. why arent you just comparing it from that?
and the stock ranges are posted in the alignment sheet. why arent you just comparing it from that?
eh thats not very good. Id take it somewhere else. who cares about lifetime. if a good shop does it right once and you dont make any changes youre good for awhile. especially on lowered car you want your toe setting close to 0 to avoid tire wear. typically a performance alignment has more neg camber in front, maybe -2 degrees. and -1 degree rear. the money you spend on tires wearing out from a crappy alignment is way more then a good 4 wheel alignment will cost.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Targa250R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
No. '96-00 Civics have a revised rear camber curve that is much more aggressive than earlier Civics and Integras. The rear gains negative camber much faster than the front, as seen in many new generation Hondas.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I learn something new every day. Ty.
Yes take it to a quality shop to align it right this time. Avoid the headache.
No. '96-00 Civics have a revised rear camber curve that is much more aggressive than earlier Civics and Integras. The rear gains negative camber much faster than the front, as seen in many new generation Hondas.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I learn something new every day. Ty.
Yes take it to a quality shop to align it right this time. Avoid the headache.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,041
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alphalanos »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">eh thats not very good. Id take it somewhere else. who cares about lifetime. if a good shop does it right once and you dont make any changes youre good for awhile. especially on lowered car you want your toe setting close to 0 to avoid tire wear. typically a performance alignment has more neg camber in front, maybe -2 degrees. and -1 degree rear. the money you spend on tires wearing out from a crappy alignment is way more then a good 4 wheel alignment will cost.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Lots of things happen during daily driving that can throw off alignment. Hitting bumps, potholes, rough railroad crossings, those kinds of things. Especially if you're car is older with worn bushings, it's even easier for alignment to get out of whack.
I like to get an alignment at least once a year, sometimes twice a year, to help keep tire wear to a minimum.
Lots of things happen during daily driving that can throw off alignment. Hitting bumps, potholes, rough railroad crossings, those kinds of things. Especially if you're car is older with worn bushings, it's even easier for alignment to get out of whack.
I like to get an alignment at least once a year, sometimes twice a year, to help keep tire wear to a minimum.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EJK20R
Suspension & Brakes
1
Mar 19, 2006 10:26 PM
Andrew 825SM
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
2
Aug 15, 2003 03:16 AM








