d15a3 vs d15b
Ok, my friend and i are arguing the differences in motors, moreover, which will do better mounted in a 1st gen CRX. My argument is that the weight difference is totally negligible, and that the power difference is worth it. His argument is that vtec takes away from the power/torque curve of a non-vtec motor. Any thoughts guys?
btw, if someone happens to know the weight difference, id appreciate it.
btw, if someone happens to know the weight difference, id appreciate it.
Well yes you would be right, the weight difference between the two motors would be next to nothing. The jdm D15b has about 20hp over the d15a3 you're comparing it to. I dont know what you mean though by vtec takes away from the power curve of a non-vtec engine. Are you talking about putting a d15b head onto a non-vtec bottom end?
Thank you!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D16SiHatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I dont know what you mean though by vtec takes away from the power curve of a non-vtec engine. Are you talking about putting a d15b head onto a non-vtec bottom end?</TD></TR></TABLE>
My friend seems to think that the power/torque curve of a non-vtec engine is biased so that the vtec engine makes less usable power and torque over a non vtec motor. this makes no sense to me, but i have nothing to back it up with other than "your dumb."
Does anyone have the weight difference somewhere? Thanks!
P.S. this is all based on the idea that a 1st gen CRX will do a little better at local auto x with the d15 rather than the d15a3. have at it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D16SiHatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I dont know what you mean though by vtec takes away from the power curve of a non-vtec engine. Are you talking about putting a d15b head onto a non-vtec bottom end?</TD></TR></TABLE>
My friend seems to think that the power/torque curve of a non-vtec engine is biased so that the vtec engine makes less usable power and torque over a non vtec motor. this makes no sense to me, but i have nothing to back it up with other than "your dumb."
Does anyone have the weight difference somewhere? Thanks!
P.S. this is all based on the idea that a 1st gen CRX will do a little better at local auto x with the d15 rather than the d15a3. have at it.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Convert »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">aha! well thanks! does anyone have a popular bolt in motor that would do well in a first gen CRX?</TD></TR></TABLE>the only engines that bolt right into the 1g CRX are the 86-89 Integra D16A1 and the JDM "browntop" DOHC ZC - with either, you need to use the 86-89 Integra transmission, intermediate shaft, axles, knuckles/hubs and shift linkage - the 86-87 D16A1 is a little easier because it has the vacuum ignition advance like the 1g CRX - 88-89 D16A1 require a little more wiring
if you wanted to purchase a mount kit, axles, shift linkage, etc. you can also swap any B-series engine into it
if the CRX is not the Si model, you need to swap out the fuel system and most of the wiring for ones from an Si model
if you wanted to purchase a mount kit, axles, shift linkage, etc. you can also swap any B-series engine into it
if the CRX is not the Si model, you need to swap out the fuel system and most of the wiring for ones from an Si model
wow, thanks so much for that information. My friend was kinda right. This makes me want to pick one these bad boys up as a prioject and do a restoration. Either way, lots of good stuff. Are there any vendors that sell a motor rebuild kit for the stock motor?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wade
Drag Racing
83
Nov 19, 2006 04:26 AM
EK9 ls vtec
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
Apr 27, 2006 06:20 PM





