B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
b20vcrxsir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia, CA, USA
Default B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission

I have a 1992 Honda Civic DX Hatchback. (Weight = 1970)

I have a B18a1 motor in it right now with a B16 tranny. In a weeks time i am going to put a turbo on the motor and boost 10psi. I wanted to know which tranny would make the car faster a B16 or a GSR on this setup?


PS: I have a GSR tranny at my house.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #2  
Topdawgg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS Canada
Default

you are gonna be good with either, but go with the GSR if you have it.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #3  
94delslo's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Texas, USA
Default Re: (Topdawgg)

gsr
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #4  
92civicx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: ct
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

you'll have faster qaurterr mile times with the b16 tranny (shorter gears), sux driving on the high way, but u can always change that 5th gear with gsr's 5th gear.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #5  
cjordan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, U.S.A
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (92civicx)

GSR
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #6  
isk8usds's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Alameda, Ca, US
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

b16 for racing, gsr if you are on the freeway a lot. I just changed my tranny to gsr and the b16 was a hell of a lot faster getting up, but i couldnt stand being at 4k+ on the freeway
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #7  
Topdawgg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS Canada
Default

just do what I did, use a b16 tranny with the LS 5th gear and be done with it...

I never shift to 5th at the track.. so its all good
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #8  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: (Topdawgg)

this thread is full of fail! the OP is asking which tranny will be FASTER and the answer to that is the one with the shorter gearing which would be the B16.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 07:18 PM
  #9  
95dc2teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Venice, Florida, US of A
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20vcrxsir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a 1992 Honda Civic DX Hatchback. (Weight = 1970)

I have a B18a1 motor in it right now with a B16 tranny. In a weeks time i am going to put a turbo on the motor and boost 10psi. I wanted to know which tranny would make the car faster a B16 or a GSR on this setup?


PS: I have a GSR tranny at my house.</TD></TR></TABLE>

the b16 will defiantely be faster, but on a side note i thought the 92 hatchback cx was the lightest model unless of course you have some weight reduction....
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
b18 hatch mike's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: wawa, united states
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (95dc2teg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95dc2teg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

the b16 will defiantely be faster, but on a side note i thought the 92 hatchback cx was the lightest model unless of course you have some weight reduction....</TD></TR></TABLE>

wrong the vx is the lightest
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 03:08 AM
  #11  
b20vcrxsir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia, CA, USA
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (95dc2teg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95dc2teg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

the b16 will defiantely be faster, but on a side note i thought the 92 hatchback cx was the lightest model unless of course you have some weight reduction....</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes, I had a lot of weight reduction
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 03:18 AM
  #12  
95dc2teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Venice, Florida, US of A
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b18 hatch mike &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

wrong the vx is the lightest </TD></TR></TABLE>

ah your right! according to this:

http://sportcompactcar.automot....html

only by about like 14lbs! lol
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #13  
neoc03's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (95dc2teg)

Sorry not trying to thread jack, but just a quick question. I have two B16 trans one with a LS 5th. I'm assuming the one with the LS 5th would be great for a 375-425whp DD. Correct?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #14  
cj_fade's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: W. Trenton, NJ, USA
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

gsr tranny..
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #15  
96 GSR-T's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (cj_fade)

B16 Tranny here with a GSR 5th, **** rolls out hard.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #16  
riceball777's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (b20vcrxsir)

it depends on how much hp you have. the shorter gears are only make your car faster only if you have traction.
if you have a stock motor and are not boosting a lot &gt;275hp then a b16 tranny will probably be faster.

but if you have like 400+hp and you have like no traction with 1-4th gear then a longer gear transmission will probably be better.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #17  
4.8t's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: patuxent river, md, usa
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (riceball777)

can some one please tell me about how much power a stock b16a trans willl hold up to. or maybe a link. i've been searching and have found nothing. looking to get about 400-450whp
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #18  
Aladar's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Spanaway, Wa, USA
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (4.8t)

b16 trans will hold as much as u want, but since your going to be slamming thru gears really fast, then as some may know, b16 does have weaker syncros than GSR, so expect it to go out quicker than a GSR would.

My 2 cent, i may have counted wrong lol
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #19  
MagnaniEG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: IL, USA
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (riceball777)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blinx9900 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">this thread is full of fail! the OP is asking which tranny will be FASTER and the answer to that is the one with the shorter gearing which would be the B16.</TD></TR></TABLE>
X2 he is right! Thread question is answer.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it depends on how much hp you have. the shorter gears are only make your car faster only if you have traction.
if you have a stock motor and are not boosting a lot &gt;275hp then a b16 tranny will probably be faster.

but if you have like 400+hp and you have like no traction with 1-4th gear then a longer gear transmission will probably be better.</TD></TR></TABLE>

This makes no sense. If you cant get traction wouldnt you get items for better traction such as radials, slicks, traction bar, etc.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #20  
mouab18c1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,071
Likes: 5
From: Washington
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (MagnaniEG6)

for a turbo setup you would want longer gear ratios.....so i'd go with the gsr...but alot of people like ls trannys for turbo setups because the gear ratios are longer then the gsr
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #21  
96 GSR-T's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (Aladar)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Aladar &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b16 does have weaker syncros than GSR, so expect it to go out quicker than a GSR would.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

who told you this?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 02:48 PM
  #22  
mouab18c1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,071
Likes: 5
From: Washington
Default Re: B16 Transmission VS. GSR Transmission (96 GSR-T)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96 GSR-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

who told you this?</TD></TR></TABLE> x2
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 07:39 AM
  #23  
g0tgot's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: Local Ice cream man / bay area 510/925
Default

i would always run LS with a turbo set up....
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 08:18 AM
  #24  
egb18c5's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: (g0tgot)

i would say bottom line, b16 for the track and gsr for anything longer than that. and u cant forget about tire size, rpms, final drive (if u decide to mess with that too) etc, they also play a big factor in gearing and when it comes to getting traction, i would think more about the size slicks that your using. any high hp car would be worthless without getting traction
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #25  
96 GSR-T's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
Default Re: (g0tgot)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by g0tgot &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i would always run LS with a turbo set up....</TD></TR></TABLE>

I ran an LS for years boosted, its really ghey If you are putting down 500whp on the street I could see an LS's benefit but anything else no....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 AM.