Car: 2008 Acura CSX Type S
Mods: Injen Short Ram Intake, Spoon Cat-Back Exhaust 64mm piping (cat-back is for the new Civic Type R FD2), T1R Race Header





















I actually quite happy with what it pulled today. I was actually expecting it to be alot less than what it turned out to be. Now all i am waiting for is my hondata reflash which supposedly is going to add 15-25 hp and 15-29ft/lbs of torque in the mid range which will totally get rid of the dip before VTEC which will make it alot more linear. I will post a new dyno sheet when i get the reflash back.

 

thats really not that great. i pulled 188 whp on my stock run, another guy (clemson hatch) at the meet pulled 191 whp stock. both FA5's. both on a dyno-jet in charleston, sc.

 

hhhmmm that's pretty good. i wonder if our elevation would come into factor? we are at 3500ft would this affect numbers?

 

LOL @ comapring dyno reuslts from different dynos from different regions with different elevations and different atmospheric conditions.


Modified by Kidnkorner at 9:30 PM 6/8/2008

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kidnkorner &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LOL @ comapring dyno reuslts from different dynos from different regions with different elevations and different atmospheric conditions.</TD></TR></TABLE>

+1 big difference

 

3500ft elevation ftl

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kidnkorner &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LOL @ comapring dyno reuslts from different dynos from different regions with different elevations and different atmospheric conditions.


Modified by Kidnkorner at 9:30 PM 6/8/2008</TD></TR></TABLE>

they are the same dyno's. but i didnt think about the elevation/region difference.
but thats a big loss due to those factors.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIVIC 3 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

they are the same dyno's. but i didnt think about the elevation/region difference.
but thats a big loss due to those factors.</TD></TR></TABLE>

the big difference is in the correction factor.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by from the interwebz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
SAE:
"SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers), USA. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C). This SAE standard requires a correction for friction torque.

STD:
STD is Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). Because the reference conditions include higher pressure and cooler air than the SAE standard, these corrected power numbers will always be about 4 % higher than the SAE power numbers. Friction torque is handled in the same way as in the SAE standard."
</TD></TR></TABLE>