baddd

 

Have never seen the outside pic of this ride.

 

not a very safe way to mount a harness

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PornoPanda &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not a very safe way to mount a harness </TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly

 

and a repost. good job

 

Yeah! Japanese racing bus!

Some people (namely myself) have actually thought about what it'd be like to rig in some actual racing seats to the front and the back. And now I know that that would just look ridiculous. I'd still rock it though.

 

what kinda car is that in? i can imagine that car hitting a speed bump and hearing all the spines go *CRUNCH*

 

whoa. baller wagon

 

it looks like there's also a roll cage

 

I giggled cause I seen it before. I can't imagine that's anything but a show car though. If it were mine I wouldn't let anyone sit in it at all.

 

ha ha ha wow! any exterior pics, its crazy

 

looks like u can squeeze 2 more in the back there
what kinda van is this?

 

i would love to see the outside of this car!

 

post more pics!

 

how would u get in the way back if the seats dont fold down??? XD

 

i know you guys said that those belts aren't safe like that but whats the difference between that and if they are mounted to a belt bar? both are going to be tight....

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Soon 2BE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know you guys said that those belts aren't safe like that but whats the difference between that and if they are mounted to a belt bar? both are going to be tight....</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well would you rather be pulled straight back or pulled down.

 

Yeah i dont understand it either.

Im a very logical thinker, and logics not helping when Im trying to think whether the seats are better with the belts pulled out instead of down. The belts are still bending around the same hole in the seat so Id think logically, it doesnt matter whether the belt ended right there on the seat or continued a mile straight outward.

And why would their spinal cords crunch? im sorry I dunno about racing seats but Im not following any of this. EXPLAIN

 

m6 mugen stream concept race van

 

Here this should clear it up.

I hope.

 

repost

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .Sarge. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Here this should clear it up.

I hope.

</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahaha actually your a f@cking god send. A buddy and I were arguing over how the belts work and angels and **** and that proved my theory to how a belt would work better because I didnt know about that harness, neither did he. But thansk a million, the pic might not of worked for others but its PERFECT for me.

 

too bad the pic only shows force in one direction..what about a side impact or a front, not just a rear end....this discussion has been coming up for years and those who have been in accidents with a harness (myself included) can vouch that i have no spinal injuries and i wasn't trapped in the car or the seat in an accident, its complete bullshit and that each accident is unique.

 

My buddy and I were aguing whether it made a difference having the harness attached a foot behind the seat or almost directly straight down from the head rest.

NOT bringing into the arguement the need for the harness bar, does it matter if the harness goes down like the van or if its a foot back.

My THEORY was that whether the harness went straight down or a foot back it didnt make a difference, and there is no difference unless the belt is angeled SO MUCH that it pulls the harness horizontally instead of vertically. Am I right or is there is significant difference between having the harness straight down opposed to angeled just a foot back. (keep in mind were talking a foot difference, not the difference between the harness bar and not) so like... either | or /