Check out this thread. Not an ITR, but I figured there are plenty of people in the ITR forum who might want to see this.


https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=226856



It's a 2002 Si hatch with an NX nitrous kit.

I know it's nitrous and all, but I have NEVER seen a dyno like that from any Honda!




[Modified by B18C5-EH2, 8:43 PM 7/10/2002]

 

:fire:

i dont think its impressive at all. 205 whp from NOS.

i'd be a little more impressed if it was a turbo or a supercharger...


[Modified by Soup ****, 8:36 PM 7/10/2002]

 

I think he's talking about the torque

 

Since you don't know me let me make something very clear:

I'm not a big fan of nitrous, nor would I ever run it or try to sell others on it.

The point of this thread isn't to say that nitrous rules or anything, but more to ask how and IF those numbers are possible.

Did you even look at the curve?

I have NEVER seen 200+whp below 4000rpms on any Honda like that, have you?

If those numbers don't impress you, then what would?

That ****'s crazy!

 

Is that before or after the installation of the SMSP header?

 

Come on damn it, I can't sit here and see 35+ views and 3 replies to something this crazy.

I guess it's totally normal for a Honda to make 200+whp and 237 torque below 3500rpms and then taper down as the RPMs rise, right?

 

haha nicey nice, but keep in mind that is more that 3x more motor than the one in question

back on topic: i think thats a mustang GT dyno


[Modified by Rob, 8:47 PM 7/10/2002]

 

Is that measured at the wheels?

And if Honda made a 6.3L engine, I bet it would rev like crazy and make more than 454 lbs./trq.

 

And with that Bob brings the classic riceboy defense into play...



EDIT: Logic dictates that since NO Hondas make graphs like that (besides this one), this isn't a Honda dyno graph.


[Modified by Reid, 3:50 PM 7/10/2002]

 

haha no ****....


by the way, if honda made a 6.3, i bet it would indeed rev like crazy, but still only have like 250tq....

 

...and 630 HP

 

Yes, it's obvious it isn't a Honda dyno graph...but here is some more riceboy logic for you Reid:

NSX has a 3.2L motor with 290 hp and 224 lbs. trq.

NSX x 2 = 6.4L motor with 580 hp and 448 lbs. trq...****, I guess I was wrong...it will make 448 lbs./trq., not 454.

I bet it would be fun to drive though

 

so lets start a vote for what that dyno is really from.....

I'm going for a 5.0 Mustang GT

 

 

The numbers look about right for a stock 5 litre, but a stock 5 litre will have its power peak at around 5700~6000, not 6500.

I'm gonna say Saab 9-3, just to throw that out there.

 

Not a Honda, and definately not a 2002 Si with NOS.
Rob,
I think you may be right, a mustang of some sorts.

Jason

 

ive seen dynos w/ jackson rading blowers make a consistent 200+ lb-ft across the whole powerband, flat as a pancake, id have to look at it again to see exactly what RPM 200lb ft was crossed.

 

Migs, Sunbeam Tiger, came factory with a 289 K block. 4 bolt mains, 4 BBl heads, Holley 650 Double pumper. almost bought one of those biotches when i got out of high school.

 

When did Honda start making pick-up truck?

 

I agree thats some crazy ****! NOS or not thats tire burning power on a new car. Stock looking 02 SI pulls a light next to unsuspecting ITR, ITR thinking I hate that car....meanwhile White hatch 02 SI is thinking I wonder if I have enough of the NOS to take this guy with a big head,lol No offense to the smart ITR driver who under most circumstances would own the SI.


[Modified by SOUNDEFFECTS, 4:08 AM 7/11/2002]

 

Push the bottom at that point? that guy who post the dyno didn't say anything? probably is cheating~~ BTW, in the form, no one actully notice that lolz




[Modified by YelLowITR, 5:28 AM 7/11/2002]

 

I think its a CL-S.
-importuner

 

chiiiiiiiiiit... my guess is someone had the dyno setup/hooked up wrong.

Otherwise, my stock Eclipse made 730 ft lbs torque one day @ the dyno.. Hehe..

 

is it possible if it has individal throttle body?

 

For the record,there are people making PEAK Tq at 2K on stock 02s.