Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2002 | 04:56 PM
  #1  
2k1_ITR_0736's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift?

I just bought a c's short shifter for my hatch,
ive heard you can potentially mess you your transmission.

Whats the general opinion on that? please help.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2002 | 05:01 PM
  #2  
97hb's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

I had one, didn't like it so I changed back to stock . After I drove my pops truck, then the stock shifter felt like a short shifter
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2002 | 05:03 PM
  #3  
shawnhayes's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Virginia, USA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

Whats the general opinion on that? please help.
Makes it easier to miss a shift. Better to leave it stock, unless you have a need to race.

Shawn
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #4  
J T*'s Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: So. California, CA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (shawnhayes)

I had one.....broke to trannys

put the stock one back in...broke another tranny.

i would just say. you can mess up your tranny with a short shifter or without a short shifter. maybe its easier to do with the short shifter, maybe harder on the syncros or somethin...i don't know but it alol depends on hard you drive it too.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
Vanilla4215's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (50percentRice)

you should get the short shifter for the feel of the shorter shifting, but not to get a lower 1/4 mile. You don't have to shift at light speed to drive good.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 12:10 PM
  #6  
2k1_ITR_0736's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (Vanilla4215)

troo. i shift pretty fast already. i dont do quarter. i do autoX and circuit...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 12:24 PM
  #7  
cr00klyn718's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

i believe its people that messes up trannys...not the shortshifter.imo
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
Sucka Free's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (cr00klyn718)

cut down ur stock shifter. looks shorter, haha. i did.
it may feel like u have shorter throws too.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 01:38 PM
  #9  
M-EJ1's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: Central WA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

I have a B&M short shifter in my civic and I rarely (maybe once a month, if i'm that lucky) miss shifts or grind gears. Even then, it's cause I just slipped up with the clutch and was ripping through the gears too quick. It's all about your driving style. If you like to really rip on the gears, then leave the stock one in I guess, cause you're probably going to cause some damage if you grind the gears and slam it around all the time.

Personally, I like the feel of the short shifter. I also have the energy suspension stiffener bushings in mine, and the crisp feel of the shifter is great. I'm fairly certain it doesn't make me any faster, but it definately makes the drive much more fun.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 02:00 PM
  #10  
neveronlines2k's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (matt-eg)

I have a short shifter in my car and would never go back to stock. Every one has their own theories on wether they are bad or not necessary , but I think it's more of a personal opinion . It has never caused any problems with my tranny or synchros. If I were you I would drive a friends car with a SS on it and see what you think. That should make it easier to decide.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 02:08 PM
  #11  
ejprimo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
From: Bad Newz Kennels
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (stuckatworksi)

i have a b&m short shifter and i love it!
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 02:12 PM
  #12  
TurboSedan's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
From: MI, USA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (ejprimo)

I have the Neuspeed one in my Civic and I like it. I do not grind/miss gears as much as I did with the stock one.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 02:50 PM
  #13  
Takeoff's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca., United States
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (TurboSedan)

I have the Skunk2 w/ the shift **** and it is great. I made mistake's both the ss and stock shifter. The shifter doesn't make the mistake. The shifter isn't going to mess up your transmission either. Transmissions get messed up by improper shifting. You should try one out if possible and see the difference. I think it make regular driving more comfortable w/ shorter shifts and for racing, I think the shifts are a lot more precise. I would also recommend getting the bushing kit also.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 02:55 PM
  #14  
LshatchTurbo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
From: Fl and DC, oooo
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (Takeoff)

Anything we do to our cars can pontentially break it. I mean come on, if we worried about all this and that, why would anyone want to mods there cars in the first place. Comes with the territory. I mean yes it is obvious a short shifter will help you shift fast thats no doubt. Heres a example. You shift gears three times during a quarter mile run, maybe four depending how fast you car is. You take a .10 of a sec of each shift in your run. If you ran a 15.6, you have no run a 15.3 or 15.2. Like some stated before, I think its people who brake cars not the short shifter it self. In my personal experience, i notice trannys go faster when people installed headers, cats, downpipes, with out a flex pipe or the spring loaded bolts. With all that power shifter, the stress has to go somewhere, mainly gears and differentials which leads to a broken tranny.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 03:34 PM
  #15  
Kengs's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,083
Likes: 0
From: Feeling FOBulous
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

If you have a C's, you will love it

You might want to post this question in the ITR forum, as more people there have experience with this particular short shifter. I have had mine for more than 40K miles with no problems whatsoever.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 06:47 PM
  #16  
2k1_ITR_0736's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (kengs)

its for my civic. the itr id fun as is. love that car. feels like its on rails.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #17  
joeseph's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

sorry if this is a stupid question but...
Do the short shifters (major brands ie C's skunk2) lower the height? I want shorter throws, but don't want to have do do the "stunna lean" (where your right shoulder is signifigantly lower than your left) when i drive.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #18  
-Darren-'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (jcnfh)

i've heard that the shorter the throw's are the shorter the life of the tranny is, but as for missing gears with a short shifter i don't see how that's possible.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2002 | 11:56 PM
  #19  
SoulSurfer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (lshatchturbo)

...You take a .10 of a sec of each shift in your run. If you ran a 15.6, you have no run a 15.3 or 15.2...
Hmm...never heard that before...I cant imagine a car dropping almost half a second just becuase of a $100 short shifter.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 01:44 AM
  #20  
Civic1.6VTEC's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL, US
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (LSDelSol)

$10 ss. ****, i payed $30 for mines more than 2 years ago. with more than 50k miles. and i love it.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 02:15 AM
  #21  
D16Z6racing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 0
From: The Emerald City, USA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (2k1_itr_0736)

I just bought a c's short shifter for my hatch,
ive heard you can potentially mess you your transmission.
I've heard that too. But I'm not grindin' gears. Besides, my ACT 6 Puck clutch eats my tranny. I love my short shifter.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 03:12 AM
  #22  
shawnhayes's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Virginia, USA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (star&buc)

i've heard that the shorter the throw's are the shorter the life of the tranny is, but as for missing gears with a short shifter i don't see how that's possible.
Because of the shorter throws, the shiftgates are closer to each other. This makes the throw "less well defined", i.e. shorter. If you occassionally miss gears with the stock shifter, you will theoretically miss them more by the ratio of the short throw to the old throw.

Shawn
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 06:09 AM
  #23  
Mafioso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (shawnhayes)

I have a Solo shifter and ****, I like it. Needed some getting used to at first.. grinded a couple gears the first few days, but all is well now!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 07:36 AM
  #24  
KF_S2000's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: WA, US
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (jcnfh)

I believe they do lower the height to achieve the shorter shift, but only slightly so you don't have to drive stunna stylez.

A short shifter ruining a transmission is something that I find very hard to believe. The main reason is because if you look at the pivot ball down to where the shifter attaches to the shift rod, most of them are the same length as the stock shifter. You usually see a reduction in length in the area above the pivot ball, so the angle of the shifter rod going into the transmission doesn't change. The main reason for tranny failure (I'm guessing most people are ruining syncros way before they should go bad) is because they aren't rev matching properly when shifting. That has nothing to do with the shifter. And you don't have to shift at the speed of light to drive well, or fast, for that matter.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2002 | 02:09 PM
  #25  
shawnhayes's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Virginia, USA
Default Re: To Short Shift, or not to SHort shift? (kf_Type-R)

The main reason for tranny failure (I'm guessing most people are ruining syncros way before they should go bad) is because they aren't rev matching properly when shifting. That has nothing to do with the shifter. And you don't have to shift at the speed of light to drive well, or fast, for that matter.
I disagree. A short shifter will make a bad driver worse, straining the synchros even faster than they were being strained to begin with. I agree that good drivers will do fine with a short shifter and not hurt the transmission, but how many honda drivers out there would you trust driving your car?

Me neither.

Shawn
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM.