AP2 stock spring rates?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">00-01 Fr: 218(3.9) - Rr: 291(5.2)
02-03 Fr: 240(4.3) - Rr: 230(4.1)
04-05 Fr: 256(4.57) - Rr: 207(3.7)</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice! i been looking for these numbers. are you certain about their accuracy?
02-03 Fr: 240(4.3) - Rr: 230(4.1)
04-05 Fr: 256(4.57) - Rr: 207(3.7)</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice! i been looking for these numbers. are you certain about their accuracy?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by M.A.R.C. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
nice! i been looking for these numbers. are you certain about their accuracy?</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. They did however release the numbers for the first year (99/00). Honda has also stated the differences in stiffness/softness in the springs by percentage when changes have been made. So after a few calculations from the given numbers and the percentage of difference between the years, you get the numbers I posted above.
nice! i been looking for these numbers. are you certain about their accuracy?</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. They did however release the numbers for the first year (99/00). Honda has also stated the differences in stiffness/softness in the springs by percentage when changes have been made. So after a few calculations from the given numbers and the percentage of difference between the years, you get the numbers I posted above.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GRAF-FITI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how dare you question papa5murf</TD></TR></TABLE>
because no one is every correct 100% of the time
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. They did however release the numbers for the first year (99/00). Honda has also stated the differences in stiffness/softness in the springs by percentage when changes have been made. So after a few calculations from the given numbers and the percentage of difference between the years, you get the numbers I posted above. </TD></TR></TABLE>
because no one is every correct 100% of the time
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. They did however release the numbers for the first year (99/00). Honda has also stated the differences in stiffness/softness in the springs by percentage when changes have been made. So after a few calculations from the given numbers and the percentage of difference between the years, you get the numbers I posted above. </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
00-01 Fr: 218(3.9) - Rr: 291(5.2)
02-03 Fr: 240(4.3) - Rr: 230(4.1)
04-05 Fr: 256(4.57) - Rr: 207(3.7)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks! Interesting how they slowly tamed the S2K suspension from a rear bias to a front bias. Very interesting...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Also interesting, I can see why they haven't ever released that info. They didn't want the press saying what I just said.
00-01 Fr: 218(3.9) - Rr: 291(5.2)
02-03 Fr: 240(4.3) - Rr: 230(4.1)
04-05 Fr: 256(4.57) - Rr: 207(3.7)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks! Interesting how they slowly tamed the S2K suspension from a rear bias to a front bias. Very interesting...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They are not exact since Honda has never released the actual numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Also interesting, I can see why they haven't ever released that info. They didn't want the press saying what I just said.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by uncleben »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Thanks! Interesting how they slowly tamed the S2K suspension from a rear bias to a front bias. Very interesting...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
To reduce snap oversteer and to make the car more forgiving to your everyday basic driver.
Thanks! Interesting how they slowly tamed the S2K suspension from a rear bias to a front bias. Very interesting...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
To reduce snap oversteer and to make the car more forgiving to your everyday basic driver.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




