All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Oil flow around 90* turn?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #1  
Aquafina's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 43
From: Johnson City TN
Default Oil flow around 90* turn?

How much does oil not like flowing under pressure through a 90* unradiused (just like the letter L )?

Just curious.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #2  
Fkned's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 1
Default Re: Oil flow around 90* turn? (Aquafina)

A non radiused fitting is very bad for flow usually.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default

I have a video somewhere of particle flow in a 90 degree bend vs a fully radius bend. Its an eye opener.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: (Combustion Contraption)

There is a 90 degree turn in the B oil pumps.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #5  
Fkned's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 1
Default Re: (Master of the Universe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Master of the Universe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">There is a 90 degree turn in the B oil pumps.</TD></TR></TABLE>And in the head,etc...
Nobody ever said it wouldn't work............
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #6  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: (Fkned)

I don't think oil flow velocity is more than 10mph so it's not a huge issue.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
dfoxengr's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
From: banned NC
Default Re: (Master of the Universe)

assuming same velocity, and a minor loss coefficient of 0.2 for a radius 90 degree bend, and 0.3 for a "regular" 90 degree bend, there will be 1.5 times more pressure loss with the non-radiused one.

those coefficients were found online(no picture), as i dont have my book with me, so id have to double check again. but thats the idea about how theyre related.

edit: but then again i just found that the non-radiused one would have a MLC of 1.0, so that would mean that its about 5 times the pressure loss.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike1114
Forced Induction
7
Aug 25, 2006 09:21 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM.