I have a B20 sleeved with 14:4:1 compression. Just resently bought the m24x cams from rocket motorsports. are they a good cam . i bought the set up for 650 for valves valve springs and retainers, brand new. is that a good cam. i had another motor with 13:1 comprsion with Jun #3 head package running 12.2. are the m24 better

 

I would wager some serious dough that the M24X would come out on top of the JUN 3 in that particular setup.

 

what he said

 

From what i can understand in his post i would say with that CR the Rocket would be better

 

Whats the best compression for the juns3 in a B series? and the M24X

 

i would say 12:5 for the JUN...anything between 12:0 and 12:5 would be perfect

 

JUN 3s have more than proven themselves to make power in as low as mid 9 compression ratios on up to above 13. you cant put a limit on their capabilities.

 

I had a set of M24x's. I can tell you from personal experience that they looked great and made me very excited as they sat on my dresser for 3 months. (story of my life)

 

The OLD M24X beat the Jun3's years ago.

September 2002 M24 v Jun3 on B20VTEC (5hp peak over J3, more in mid).

 

5HP is not that big of a difference Its a matter of taste i guess

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA_JDM &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">5HP is not that big of a difference Its a matter of taste i guess </TD></TR></TABLE>

5 PEAK. midrange power is just as if not more important

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA_JDM &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">5HP is not that big of a difference Its a matter of taste i guess </TD></TR></TABLE>
so you like to lose?

losing taste sour to me

 

Those are the OLD M24X, not the new, bigger M24X. At the time, Jun3's reigned supreme. I'll take the small 5 peak along with the killer midrange.

 

looks like a tuned VS not tuned graph to me. im not saying your lying, just so closely resemble each other.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1 2 NV &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks like a tuned VS not tuned graph to me. im not saying your lying, just so closely resemble each other.</TD></TR></TABLE>

X2

However, just by looking at advertised specs, the M22X more resembles the JUN3 profile than the M24X.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Racewerkz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i bought the set up for 650 for valves valve springs and retainers, brand new. is that a good cam.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Seems like a question to ask long before you buy the cams, not after. Hope it works out well for ya though.

 

well we will see when i dyno the motor. i will try and post the #`s and the graph

 

im still making the same power, with both cams. 221 with the jun3 and 227 with the m24
ive heard of some cams that make more power around the 240 hp. is my compression to high,

 

Wow, the censorship is becoming ridiculous.

 

m22x?

LOL its starred out.. thats great

rocket motor sports cams will probably run with w/e you buy and out perform it.

 

Well the M24 made more. Cams do not make 240, they just support it if you have the build, head flow/velocity, intake, and headers. You picked BHP with the xxx cams now tune the rest.

 

 

complete your package then dyno again till you reach the magical number you want.actually, you should have planned your build with the parts that will give you the HP you aim for.Cams are just part of the whole equation. the M24 will no doubt give you 240hp if tuned right.

 

where can i purchase rocket cams? their website doesn't seem set up too well for orders.

 

I'll pm u his addy