A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck?

I am having problems deciding which manifold to buy..First off, I live in FL, which is pretty hot almost all year. Second, it's my daily driver so a/c is pretty important. I'm planning on making ~400hp on a built b16a running a t3/t4 turbo.. so I think a log-style would hurt me pretty bad. Can anyone recommend a welder that makes an A/C compatible equal length kit for B series? I forgot to mention i'm a cheap *** so if you say peekboost or full-race i'm going to ignore you..
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
Riake's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (jdm_vtec)

Why do you want an equal length so bad? You can make 400~ on a log. What turbo are you going to run?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (Riake)

I've got a turbonetics T3/T04e 57 trim (63/60), 44mm wastegate and a stock SR20DET bov
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #4  
DeadVet's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Maine, USA
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (jdm_vtec)

You really do get what you pay for.....What i cant figure out is why people want the luxuries of a/c and p/s in a 400whp car but cant shell the money because they are "cheap asses".

Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #5  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (jdm_vtec)

I don't want a log simply because the turbulence caused by the outside runners hitting the middle two kills the flow, therefore causes a loss of power
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #6  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (1TurboHatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1TurboHatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You really do get what you pay for.....What i cant figure out is why people want the luxuries of a/c and p/s in a 400whp car but cant shell the money because they are "cheap asses".

</TD></TR></TABLE>

I don't want power steering.. the reason I want A/C is because i'm in FL! everything i've done thus far has been a budget build.. I paid 100 for a new turbonetics turbo, 100 for a wastegate, free bov, free charge pipes.. and had the motor built about a year ago when I actually HAD money. i'm a broke *** college students now just trying to get by. also, before you say "then you shouldn't be boosting your car", fist yourself
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #7  
rmcdaniels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (jdm_vtec)

You don't really need equal length, as long as it has a good merge collector. Something compact and relatively affordable like a Lovefab Mini-Me AC manifold would work well without being too expensive.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #8  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default

thanks for the suggestion rmcdaniels.. is there an accurate dyno testing done to experiment with log vs. equal length power gains/loss ? I know full-race did one but that's not creditable in my opinion due to their business alone.. of course they are going to say their expensive manifolds make 80+ hp
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #9  
Riake's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default Re: (jdm_vtec)

An Spoolin Quick 4 AC should also do well for you. However, I just dont understand why you want an equal length for only 400whp. You arent going to be near maxing your turbo so you wont need the extra power for the equal length but if you want to get one that bad then I would go to Spoolin. I wish that I had instead of a different company.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #10  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: A/C compatible equal length: the best bang for the buck? (jdm_vtec)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdm_vtec &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't want a log simply because the turbulence caused by the outside runners hitting the middle two kills the flow, therefore causes a loss of power </TD></TR></TABLE>

then buy a meutek manifold, they have a little air diverter thingy
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #11  
rmcdaniels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: (jdm_vtec)

Cody Loveland did a bunch of testing, he's the one that told me that the compact manifolds like the Mini-Me (The Spoolin Quick 4 is another example of this type of manifold) worked just about as well as the larger equal-length ramhorn manifolds. When I switched from an Inline-Pro cast manifold to a Lovefab SST (big ramhorn manifold) I picked up over 50 WHP, same motor, turbo, boost, everything except the manifold and downpipe.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #12  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Cody Loveland did a bunch of testing, he's the one that told me that the compact manifolds like the Mini-Me (The Spoolin Quick 4 is another example of this type of manifold) worked just about as well as the larger equal-length ramhorn manifolds. When I switched from an Inline-Pro cast manifold to a Lovefab SST (big ramhorn manifold) I picked up over 50 WHP, same motor, turbo, boost, everything except the manifold and downpipe.</TD></TR></TABLE>

did you go up to a bigger downpipe? what was the before and after numbers?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #13  
jdm_vtec's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Cody Loveland did a bunch of testing, he's the one that told me that the compact manifolds like the Mini-Me (The Spoolin Quick 4 is another example of this type of manifold) worked just about as well as the larger equal-length ramhorn manifolds. When I switched from an Inline-Pro cast manifold to a Lovefab SST (big ramhorn manifold) I picked up over 50 WHP, same motor, turbo, boost, everything except the manifold and downpipe.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree, it's pretty much the collector that makes the difference.. the log style manifolds create turbulence when the 1st and 4th runners meet with the middle 2. the quick4 and other smaller manifolds with equal collectors would be just as good for anything under 600 hp in my opinion.

did boost come in noticeably faster when you switched to the equal length?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #14  
rmcdaniels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: (blinx9900)

Downpipe was 3" after, 2.5" before, so I got a few HP from that, and both into a 3" exhaust. That was years ago, and I don't have any the Inline Pro dyno graphs any more, but ended up making almost 400 WHP out of a B16 -w- a GT28RS on it.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #15  
blinx9900's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Downpipe was 3" after, 2.5" before, so I got a few HP from that, and both into a 3" exhaust. That was years ago, and I don't have any the Inline Pro dyno graphs any more, but ended up making almost 400 WHP out of a B16 -w- a GT28RS on it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

sounds good ive been eyeing the quick 4 to replace my meutek for a while now, but im still happy with the car and dont feel like building another 3" dp... oneday...
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #16  
rmcdaniels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: (jdm_vtec)

Boost built later -w- the ramhorn, which is normal, but once it started building it ramped up faster. Below a certain RPM the log makes more power than the ramhorn, but the ramhorn makes more power later.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bluenc-87
Forced Induction
4
Apr 22, 2016 05:28 PM
davidluko
Forced Induction
10
Jan 18, 2007 06:30 PM
Stro
Forced Induction
7
Oct 8, 2006 05:36 PM
onlyneed4
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
7
Jun 9, 2005 08:07 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 AM.