I believe my car did pretty good!

Mods: Intake, Header, 2.5" piping, & Hondata Reflash

The lowest hp run was because the sensor at the exhuast tip fell off.

 

almost broke 200whp.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tzang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The lowest hp run was because the sensor at the exhuast tip fell off.

</TD></TR></TABLE>


the wideband? that has nothing to do with your HP results.

anyway, what did you put down....i can't view pics at work.

 

Oh ok nvm then..haha..the guy said my car was too hot too..lol..the best run was 199 hp 143 tq

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tzang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oh ok nvm then..haha..the guy said my car was too hot too..lol..the best run was 199 hp 143 tq</TD></TR></TABLE>

thats good! just a while back B series guys would kill to hit numbers like that....now it's so easy


and yes HP starts to drop off once everything becomes heat soaked.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dirtySOHC’s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

and yes HP starts to drop off once everything becomes heat soaked.

</TD></TR></TABLE>
HEAT BAD FOR ENGINES

 

Did you dyno the car stock to see if the money you put in was worth the power gains?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BrainFart &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Did you dyno the car stock to see if the money you put in was worth the power gains? </TD></TR></TABLE>

thats what i did...i got a baseline of my car.

but good runs...dont know how you would know if your car had any gains or what not..but im pretty sure you did. your a/f is weird too.

 

what kinda header and intake and exhaust do u have on the car.

 

DC race header, stock exhaust with custom 2.5" piping

 

I didn't dyno my car stock..but I'm pretty impressed with my numbers....according to other's that have the same mods..they are getting 190s-197 hp...so if mines pulled 199 wooot i must be pretty lucky.

 

I thought the car would compensate for the mods and adjust the A/F ratio? I thought I read somewhere a car runs best at a 14:1 a/f ratio, so does that mean your car is under-performing compared to what it could do?

 

I did 199.8 with DCRH, Injen SR and STOCK exhaust

 

oh word?<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Caveman74 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I did 199.8 with DCRH, Injen SR and STOCK exhaust</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Sweet, nice numbers

 

LOL cool man...thats props from me...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by elohel &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought the car would compensate for the mods and adjust the A/F ratio? I thought I read somewhere a car runs best at a 14:1 a/f ratio, so does that mean your car is under-performing compared to what it could do?</TD></TR></TABLE>

you want to be in the 14's for normal driving.

under load you want to be as close to 13.0 as possible. 14 underload is super lean.

that is a generalization...it varies between setups

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by elohel &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought the car would compensate for the mods and adjust the A/F ratio? I thought I read somewhere a car runs best at a 14:1 a/f ratio, so does that mean your car is under-performing compared to what it could do?</TD></TR></TABLE>


14:1 air fuel ratio is for emessions purposes only...but performance wise you might wanna consider a 12:5 - 12:7 air fuel ratio or atleast close to 13's


Modified by FG_2_KILLS at 8:40 PM 9/25/2007

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dirtySOHC’s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

you want to be in the 14's for normal driving.

under load you want to be as close to 13.0 as possible. 14 underload is super lean.

that is a generalization...it varies between setups</TD></TR></TABLE>

hahaha...same answer you got...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Caveman74 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I did 199.8 with DCRH, Injen SR and STOCK exhaust</TD></TR></TABLE>

Different dyno, different day, different results

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tzang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">DC race header, stock exhaust with custom 2.5" piping </TD></TR></TABLE>

What do you mean by "stock exhaust" with custom 2.5 pipping?

 

think he means stock muffler welded on to custom 2.5 piping.

 

Yes sir...my bad. Stock muffler with custom 2.5" piping

 

Damn K series... almost 200 whp that easy.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tam N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Different dyno, different day, different results</TD></TR></TABLE>

Blah. blah , blah.. just goes to prove that we are very close in numbers with almost the same setup. He also has the reflash

And I have seen plenty of dynoes that have expensive catback exhaust and header that you would think would hit WAY higher numbers and dont.