Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Suspension for a 1997 Sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #1  
EverydayGetaway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Crownsville, MD, Anne Arundel
Default Suspension for a 1997 Sedan

About a month ago I bought a set of Tokico HP springs and shocks off a friend that were practically brand new. He had them on a project EG hatchback and never actually drove the car with them installed. My friend was unsure if they would fit my car but we managed to install them with minimal hassle. However, now a month later the car sits noticably lower in the back. I know that springs usually take a few weeks to break in, but I have been driving a lot (probably 2,000mi) and still the ride looks funky.

My first question is, are EG and EK suspension components different? Or are Hatchback and Sedan components different?

My second question is if I were to swap them out, should I trade for my friends (much more used) Tokico Illumina's with Skunk 2 sleeve coilovers (off of a 94 coupe). Or buy a set of KYB G2 shocks off of another friends EK coupe for $150 and still trade my springs for the Skunk 2's? Sorry if all this is confusing but These parts won't be available for long...
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #2  
BlackoutVTi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
From: Stay away from my car,, CA, USA
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (EverydayGetaway)

Don't know much about the issue, but I would think that the springrates for the hatchback are not meant to handle the extra weight in the back, which is present with a sedan. This may be the reason you have a sagging back end on your car.

As for the new suspension options, look around the website, you'll find what people prefer for their sedans.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #3  
EverydayGetaway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Crownsville, MD, Anne Arundel
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (BlackoutVTi)

That being said, do you think that my springs/shocks would be okay on a coupe? (So my friend will trade)
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #4  
BlackoutVTi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
From: Stay away from my car,, CA, USA
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (EverydayGetaway)

Too many variables to that. You'll just have to see. If they're blown out, you may have to give your friend back his money, or he'll be very mad with you.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
dizzzane's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Japan Direct
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (BlackoutVTi)

Im sure the spring rates for a hatch should be less than those of a sedan, therefore the weight in the rear will make it "sag" while the front rates are most likely the same and will appear normal......... giving you the sloppy stance you see before you.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #6  
EverydayGetaway's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Crownsville, MD, Anne Arundel
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (BlackoutVTi)

Nah, their definatly not blown. lol.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #7  
dizzzane's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Japan Direct
Default Re: Suspension for a 1997 Sedan (EverydayGetaway)

If you have the time, you could put your struts on on a coupe and see if they sag as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
triangle1020
Suspension & Brakes
38
Feb 24, 2010 05:48 PM
Group Tenacity
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
27
Jun 3, 2009 10:03 AM
drave
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
Dec 12, 2008 11:41 PM
trianglegreg
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
11
Dec 6, 2005 10:15 AM
sil80drifter
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Nov 30, 2005 11:58 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 AM.