How good is our stock exhaust?
yeah...our exhaust..i wouldn't say is good for power...stock form yeah...sounds good yeah...but power wise...your not gonna get alot out..let's say you got a S/C with stock exhaust...might as well upgrade it to get more power out of it.
Trending Topics
From the factory the new 2006 Honda Civic Si boasts some impressive numbers. Normally aspirated the new Civic Si produces 171hp and 126 lbs of torque (as measured on a Mustang Dyno).
However, boost is KING! Doing what we do best, we set out many months ago to create the finest supercharger system available for the new Civic Si. Our newest addition to the JR family represents our best work. How did we do? Horsepower on the base kit increased to 234hp and 171 ft. lbs. of torque (measured at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno). This is using the stock airbox, header and exhaust. Not CARB approved.
http://www.supercharger.com/Sh...56783
That is what the Jackson site says. I feel that is impressive for all stock componets.
However, boost is KING! Doing what we do best, we set out many months ago to create the finest supercharger system available for the new Civic Si. Our newest addition to the JR family represents our best work. How did we do? Horsepower on the base kit increased to 234hp and 171 ft. lbs. of torque (measured at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno). This is using the stock airbox, header and exhaust. Not CARB approved.
http://www.supercharger.com/Sh...56783
That is what the Jackson site says. I feel that is impressive for all stock componets.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Type X »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on dyno's the OEM exhaust/header combo performed extremely well
</TD></TR></TABLE>
and the stock is probably a lot quieter than a loud *** after market exhaust. Some people dont want a loud car 24/7. i prefer quiet except when i get on it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
and the stock is probably a lot quieter than a loud *** after market exhaust. Some people dont want a loud car 24/7. i prefer quiet except when i get on it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KlickityClack07 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
and the stock is probably a lot quieter than a loud *** after market exhaust. Some people dont want a loud car 24/7. i prefer quiet except when i get on it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which is why I chose the EVO2... man I love it.
and the stock is probably a lot quieter than a loud *** after market exhaust. Some people dont want a loud car 24/7. i prefer quiet except when i get on it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which is why I chose the EVO2... man I love it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pampass_pmw »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">From the factory the new 2006 Honda Civic Si boasts some impressive numbers. Normally aspirated the new Civic Si produces 171hp and 126 lbs of torque (as measured on a Mustang Dyno).
However, boost is KING! Doing what we do best, we set out many months ago to create the finest supercharger system available for the new Civic Si. Our newest addition to the JR family represents our best work. How did we do? Horsepower on the base kit increased to 234hp and 171 ft. lbs. of torque (measured at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno). This is using the stock airbox, header and exhaust. Not CARB approved.
http://www.supercharger.com/Sh...56783
That is what the Jackson site says. I feel that is impressive for all stock componets. </TD></TR></TABLE>
What the hell does this have to do with the posters question on exhaust? Or were you just looking for an in to do some free advertising?
However, boost is KING! Doing what we do best, we set out many months ago to create the finest supercharger system available for the new Civic Si. Our newest addition to the JR family represents our best work. How did we do? Horsepower on the base kit increased to 234hp and 171 ft. lbs. of torque (measured at the wheels on a Mustang Dyno). This is using the stock airbox, header and exhaust. Not CARB approved.
http://www.supercharger.com/Sh...56783
That is what the Jackson site says. I feel that is impressive for all stock componets. </TD></TR></TABLE>
What the hell does this have to do with the posters question on exhaust? Or were you just looking for an in to do some free advertising?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hellzcivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What the hell does this have to do with the posters question on exhaust? Or were you just looking for an in to do some free advertising?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I only felt that was aiding in the question because those are suppose to be numbers with stock componets.I do believe he is asking if he NEEDS to upgrade. I thought they were good numbers for stock exhaust!
I only felt that was aiding in the question because those are suppose to be numbers with stock componets.I do believe he is asking if he NEEDS to upgrade. I thought they were good numbers for stock exhaust!
If it was as good as it sounds, it would be fantastic. sadly, that's far from true.
IF i had the money, I'd definately upgrade in order Intake, Header, Exhaust.
IF i had the money, I'd definately upgrade in order Intake, Header, Exhaust.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Telega C 33
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
May 22, 2005 05:08 PM



