rear discs?
You don't technically need to swap out booster and master cylinder. However, it is recommended, because the whole reason you are swapping your brakes is to achieve more rear brake bias. You also need to look into a brake proportioning valve. Do a search, their are way too many threads on rear disc swaps. Also try the FAQ at the top of the 92-00 Civic Forum.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 94c1v1cex »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">got a 94 ex coupe and wondering if i can just swap out the rear drums for rotors and calipers and not have to upgrade the booster or anything?</TD></TR></TABLE>
94 EX came with rear disc........all 92-95 Civic EX's and Si's did.
94 EX came with rear disc........all 92-95 Civic EX's and Si's did.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D16Z6racing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">94 EX came with rear disc........all 92-95 Civic EX's and Si's did.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no...only if they had abs..
no...only if they had abs..
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 94c1v1cex »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not all of them. i have the power sunroof n power everything but no abs or read discs</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good to know. I was looking at 5th gen EX for the fact of 1.6, fully loaded, and thinking it came with rear disc.
Good to know. I was looking at 5th gen EX for the fact of 1.6, fully loaded, and thinking it came with rear disc.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D16Z6racing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Good to know. I was looking at 5th gen EX for the fact of 1.6, fully loaded, and thinking it came with rear disc.</TD></TR></TABLE>
actually, the 5th gen civic ex didn't get abs, rear disc brakes until 94 & 95.
Good to know. I was looking at 5th gen EX for the fact of 1.6, fully loaded, and thinking it came with rear disc.</TD></TR></TABLE>
actually, the 5th gen civic ex didn't get abs, rear disc brakes until 94 & 95.
It's a good idea to change them anyway, your running more fluid, so it's better to have that brake booster and mc, and more of your braking than before is being done by the rear brakes, so you need the proportioning valve to compensate for new bias.
Some people claim that the prop valves are the same. This is correct that they look the same externally, but in a valve, it's whats inside that counts.
Modified by ek forever guy at 2:54 PM 7/20/2007
Some people claim that the prop valves are the same. This is correct that they look the same externally, but in a valve, it's whats inside that counts.
Modified by ek forever guy at 2:54 PM 7/20/2007
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93civ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just got done with that swap and all i changed was the rotors,brake lines,and calipers. You must do a flush</TD></TR></TABLE>
does it brake better or do you think you should've changed mc/bb?
does it brake better or do you think you should've changed mc/bb?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> your running more fluid, so it's better to have that brake booster and mc, and more of your braking is being done by the rear brakes,
</TD></TR></TABLE>
can you elaborate on this more. last time i checked, most of the braking is done by the fronts.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
can you elaborate on this more. last time i checked, most of the braking is done by the fronts.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philosofy1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">can you elaborate on this more. last time i checked, most of the braking is done by the fronts.</TD></TR></TABLE>
More than before.
You knew what I meant.
More than before.
You knew what I meant.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
More than before.
You knew what I meant.</TD></TR></TABLE>
OOOOOOKKKKKKKKAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just wanted to make sure. if i was a noob, i would have thought the opposite
.
yes i agree with you, when doing this swap, the 4040 prop valve is necessary.
the only bad thing about swapping out the prop valve is that sometime the linse a rusted frozen and strip, or in my case break off.
on that note, that i know of, the 4040 prop valves can be found DA integra's and DC integra's non abs (RS & LS).
More than before.
You knew what I meant.</TD></TR></TABLE>OOOOOOKKKKKKKKAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just wanted to make sure. if i was a noob, i would have thought the opposite
.yes i agree with you, when doing this swap, the 4040 prop valve is necessary.
the only bad thing about swapping out the prop valve is that sometime the linse a rusted frozen and strip, or in my case break off.
on that note, that i know of, the 4040 prop valves can be found DA integra's and DC integra's non abs (RS & LS).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kreush33
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Oct 7, 2002 11:21 AM



