Turbo/ SC/ NA?
please someone convince me if I should go FI or NA? I know that turbo/supercharger = lots of power at low $. NA = lots of $ + headaches and small power output. But what do you think is actually worthy?
I don't forsee this thread being very informative for you... You should use the search feature, this has been covered alot.
I forgot on here who said it but I've never seen it put better.
Fast, Cheap, Reliable..... pick two, you'll be lacking the other.
T-minus 5 seconds till cat pictures.
I forgot on here who said it but I've never seen it put better.
Fast, Cheap, Reliable..... pick two, you'll be lacking the other.
T-minus 5 seconds till cat pictures.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SerGTR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Tnx for info, and I decided to keep heR NA since thats what it was meant to be.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea most say that. Talk to some people with boosted R's, they lovem. You get a few now and again that regret boosting but mainly because they didn't do things right the first time and run into problems.
Yea most say that. Talk to some people with boosted R's, they lovem. You get a few now and again that regret boosting but mainly because they didn't do things right the first time and run into problems.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SerGTR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Tnx for info, and I decided to keep heR NA since thats what it was meant to be.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Be ready to pay... I guess i'm one of those idealists that still think the R should be a n/a b18c5.... no K's, no F/I.... however I don't hate on the people that do go those routes.
Be ready to pay... I guess i'm one of those idealists that still think the R should be a n/a b18c5.... no K's, no F/I.... however I don't hate on the people that do go those routes.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by itrSteez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I forgot on here who said it but I've never seen it put better.
Fast, Cheap, Reliable..... pick two, you'll be lacking the other</TD></TR></TABLE>
this has been around for a long time. it is spot on
I forgot on here who said it but I've never seen it put better.
Fast, Cheap, Reliable..... pick two, you'll be lacking the other</TD></TR></TABLE>
this has been around for a long time. it is spot on
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tartje »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
this has been around for a long time. it is spot on
</TD></TR></TABLE>
This actually makes so much sense to me now because it is true, but I still think that ITR should be used and upgraded the way it was (originally) meant to be.
this has been around for a long time. it is spot on
</TD></TR></TABLE>This actually makes so much sense to me now because it is true, but I still think that ITR should be used and upgraded the way it was (originally) meant to be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





