Sch. 40 stainless weld 90's
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SMSP »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought most were using sch 10? 1-1/2" sch 10 has a wal thickness of .019" where as sch 40 is .145"</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha, is that .019" sch 10 inconel?
I wonder what the difference in i.d. between sch. 10 and sch. 40 would do for power?
haha, is that .019" sch 10 inconel?
I wonder what the difference in i.d. between sch. 10 and sch. 40 would do for power?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LOL, starting a new trend for N/A headers Randy?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not only won't the header's crack but they'll add weight to the front of the car to aid traction...
</TD></TR></TABLE>Not only won't the header's crack but they'll add weight to the front of the car to aid traction...
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SMSP »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought most were using sch 10? 1-1/2" sch 10 has a wal thickness of .019" where as sch 40 is .145"</TD></TR></TABLE>
Na that's a HUGE difference!
sch 10 is .109" wall thickness
sch 40 is .145" wall thickness
Na that's a HUGE difference!
sch 10 is .109" wall thickness
sch 40 is .145" wall thickness
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SMSP »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ah, bitten by the old decimal point.</TD></TR></TABLE>
and positioning
and positioning
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AspectIndustries
Classifieds: Forced Induction
13
Jan 18, 2006 12:03 AM




